Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:23:27AM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote: > If you have one of the 3 chipsets only supported in 4.2, there is > nothing stopping you from installing that. Except that you are instead > mucking around spouting ideas straight from your ass on a mailing list, > instead of lear

Re: [SDL] SDL 1.2.4 debian packages

2002-04-16 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:56:43AM -0700, Sam Lantinga wrote: > > I'm hitting a bit of a stumbling block in preparing SDL 1.2.4 packages for > > woody. The problem is that SDL does not work with ALSA 0.9 yet (I will do > > something about this at some point, really I will...) > > I've already imp

Re: Bug #140769: frozen-bubble: RC bug

2002-04-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:29:39PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > This is really annoying. > > Maybe we have to find a way to prevent the game from working on the > developers' machines. > Does anyone mind my adding a conflict with debhelper (and maybe > libc6-dev) ? Hrm, well, I guess that in

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Rich Rudnick
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:49, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:28:50AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > > What comes to encouraging other people - guess what I'm doing right now. > > No you are definetly not. You are pissing people off. > > > Other platforms aren't nearly as signi

because it isn't said enough

2002-04-16 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
I recently ran into this on my current project (blackbox window manager). Too often as developers the people we talk to are the ones seeking help and guidance. Whether it is a bug, ignorance, stupidity, that crazy genius only they will ever understand, whatever we deal with them, coddle them. Bu

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Lasse! You wrote: > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE! Congratulations. Now please return to your Redhat box. -- Kind regards, +---+ | Bas Zoetekouw

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Paul Hedderly
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:01:10AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:30:20AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > I guess you didn't read my original message: the problem is that I know > > next to nothing about Debian. > > Yes, that sums

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Martin Pool
On 16 Apr 2002, Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forgot to cc this to the list.. The message is attached. Here's another clue, for free: when somebody specifically replies to you rather to the list, and points that out in the message body, they probably had a reason. Going back on to

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Ari Makela
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:04:09AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > That's the result of reading your (=Debian developers') rude replies to > very polite questions asked by other people. If you claim that your first post was polite I am truly amazed. It was a very rude and very clueless attack a

Re: Final call for votes for the debian project leader election 2002

2002-04-16 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:52:06PM +0200, Davide G . M . Salvetti wrote: > <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> > - - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > [ 3] Choice 1: Branden Robinson > [ 1] Choice 2: Raphael Hertzog > [ 2] Choice 3: Bdale Garbee > [ 4]

Re: XFree86 4.2.0

2002-04-16 Thread PP Spiertz
(ok, and this is *my* first message to debian-devel ever) Branden's great reply on this, lately on Slashdot, was actually the very reason that I became interested in packaging for Debian. I don't think Branden should have anything to add since he wrote this: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30

Re: Bug #140769: frozen-bubble: RC bug

2002-04-16 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
Josselin [EMAIL PROTECTED]@15 Apr 2002 22:29:39 +0200: > Does anyone mind my adding a conflict with debhelper (and maybe > libc6-dev) ? > Debhelper only, please.. I don't use debhelper. :-) -- *=-+-__ |[EMAIL PROTECTED]: _ Ugh! Nio2f says something: __ : http

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
Lasse, please read the following SlashDot comment written by Branden. It explains why Woody will not come with 4.2.0: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30663&cid=3297389 And now feel impressed by his work. ;-) -- *=-+-__ |[EMAIL PROTECTED]: _ Ugh! Nio2f says somethi

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:23:27AM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote: >> If you have one of the 3 chipsets only supported in 4.2, there is >> nothing stopping you from installing that. [...] > One of them is Matrox's G550, one of them is one or another of the >

Re: because it isn't said enough

2002-04-16 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:41:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > I recently ran into this on my current project (blackbox window manager). > > Too often as developers the people we talk to are the ones seeking help and > guidance. Whether it is a bug, ignorance, stupidity, that crazy genius

Any DDs out there with a Nomad Jukebox?

2002-04-16 Thread Shaun Jackman
I am looking for a sponsor for two packages: kionjb and libnjb. kionjb lets you view and manipulate the tracks on your Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox MP3 player. It is a KIO::Slave and requires KDE2. Source is available at the kionjb web site http://sf.net/projects/kionjb/ libnjb is a shared li

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 04:57, Jeff Licquia wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:14, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > > Hi! (it's my first post here) > > > > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE! > > > > Yes, it really has been three (3) mo

Re: Debian Press update

2002-04-16 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Lasse Karrainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-16 05:14]: > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020130 Why doesn't that surprise me? > Hi! (it's my first post here) And hopefully your last. > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > IT'S A QU

Re: because it isn't said enough

2002-04-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:41:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > So, I would just like to remind people to occasionally send a "thank you" to > those out there who make your day go by. It really goes a long way to helping > us devel types deal with life. Thanks for reminding me! From the A

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 10:20:16AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 04:57, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:14, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > > > Hi! (it's my first post here) > > > > > > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > > > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Peter Mathiasson
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:58:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > You are, of course, free to package your own private X > system. After all, you seem to think you have a clue about the > amount of work that entails. "People have managed to install it from sources in matter of HOURS (we

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Marek Habersack
** On Apr 16, Manoj Srivastava scribbled: > >>"Lasse" == Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lasse> Time to throw some gasoline on the flames ... Branden apparently is > Lasse> incapable of releasing it. So, I suggest that anyone, with enough > Lasse> knowledge and TIME, reading this,

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE! > > Yes, it really has been three (3) months (!) since it was released. so? 4.1 works just fine. > Time to throw some ga

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Krzysztof Krzyzaniak
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:30:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE! > > > > Yes, it really has been three (3) months (!) s

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Marek Habersack
** On Apr 16, Andreas Metzler scribbled: > Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:23:27AM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote: > >> If you have one of the 3 chipsets only supported in 4.2, there is > >> nothing stopping you from installing that. > [...] > > > One of them i

Re: [2002-04-16] Release Status Update

2002-04-16 Thread Stefan Hornburg Racke
Anthony Towns writes: > Hi all, > > Unhappily, the "move postgresql from non-US to main" part of the > "crypto-in-main" transition was harder than expected due to a library > package rename (libpgsql2 in stable had be renamed to libpgsql2.1 in > woody, but has since been renamed back to libpgsql

Re: Any DDs out there with a Nomad Jukebox?

2002-04-16 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
Shaun [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 16 Apr 2002 01:14:08 -0700: > Anyone interested? (particularly someone that owns a Nomad Jukebox) > If it's portable and plays ogg/vorbis-files I might buy one... ;-) -- *=-+-__ |[EMAIL PROTECTED]: _ Ugh! Nio2f says something: __ :

FW: Run-time library update

2002-04-16 Thread Wilson
> Hi there, > Ive been goind trough ur web site and documents, and found them extremely > useful. Ive a query on shared libraries. > Ive an application running, which links certain shared libs. Can I update > the library during run-time, and load it into the application without > stoping it? (I

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 10:20, Russell Coker wrote: > > Someone as stupid as Lasse is unlikely to live very long anyway. > > Maybe we need a new sub-distribution, Debian for glue-sniffers? > maybe we need to ignore morons like him. I think him getting tens and tens of answers to his stupid mail me

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Will Newton
On Tuesday 16 Apr 2002 4:04 am, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > Well, it seems that you almost need 4.2.0 for Woody anyway, if it is > going to work with any recent hardware (unless you are aiming for > servers only). Or are you going to hack 4.2.0 display drivers into 4.1.0? As it happens 4.2.0 seems

Re: FW: Run-time library update

2002-04-16 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:26, Wilson wrote: > > Hi there, > > Ive been goind trough ur web site and documents, and found them extremely > > useful. Ive a query on shared libraries. > > Ive an application running, which links certain shared libs. Can I update > > the library during run-time, and load

Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody

2002-04-16 Thread Branden Robinson
A couple of people on a recent thread in debian-devel linked to a message I recently posted on Slashdot on this subject. I had thought about posting this information to Debian's lists as well, but at the time, didn't see a need. Thanks to that recent thread, now I see a need. :) Well, I mysel

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:03:47AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > Someone said that X is a difficult package to maintain and that there > is nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed > to install it from sources in matter of HOURS (well, that didn't work > for me, dunno w

Re: dialog alternatives

2002-04-16 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:13:40PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Jochen writes: > > I think I incorporated all gdialog patches you sent to the BTS. Or did I > > miss something? > All those bugs appear to have been fixed, though I see no mention of my > patches in the changelog. Sorry! Maybe

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Ashton Trey Belew
Hello, Just thought I would pipe in that I am supremely happy with the X 4.1 package. Have a nice day, -Trey pgpT14C75sPP3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Any DDs out there with a Nomad Jukebox?

2002-04-16 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:08:44AM +, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote: > > Anyone interested? (particularly someone that owns a Nomad Jukebox) > > > If it's portable and plays ogg/vorbis-files I might buy one... ;-) Requires a beta firmware that was never actually released to the public, but it

Re: donated amiga '060 update

2002-04-16 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Well, today I went and picked up the m68k machine kindly donated > by Anton Emmerfors some months ago. > > It was already packaged and ready to go, so all I had to do was to > take it to the postoffice, and send it off to Ingo Juergensmann > in Germany, who will do OS and network card installati

ITP: libsocket++ - Socket abstraction library for C++

2002-04-16 Thread Simon Richter
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Hi, I intent to package libsocket++, a small C++ library that abstracts network sockets. It provides buffered reads/writes and address family independent handling of sockets. I am the upstream author, this is basically split out of the "buildd in C++" project bec

Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody

2002-04-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:01:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > A couple of people on a recent thread in debian-devel linked to a > message I recently posted on Slashdot on this subject. I had thought > about posting this information to Debian's lists as well, but at the > time, didn't see a n

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:09:55PM -0500, Scott Dier wrote: > bleeding software. Brandon has added functionality to our X packages Run, Scott :) -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux Reinos

slightly OT: nfs error on Debian kernel

2002-04-16 Thread Carl B. Constantine
I installed an official kernel-source-2.4.17 and compiled it up. Recently, I also compiled in nfs support: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]:linux-2.4.17)# grep -i nfs .config # CONFIG_NFS_FS is not set CONFIG_NFSD=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y note that it's compiled in and not as a module. I've installed the nfs-common

Re: [2002-04-16] Release Status Update

2002-04-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:38:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > beancounter > courier-ssl > dbf2sql > ddt > gtksql > libpgsql-ruby > med-dent > odontolinux > pike7-crypto > proftpd > qttudo > sourceforge > sql-editor >

problems with nfs on Debian unstable.

2002-04-16 Thread Carl B. Constantine
I'm hoping someone here can help with this problem, maybe the NFS maintainer? I installed an official kernel-source-2.4.17 and compiled it up. Recently, I also compiled in nfs support: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]:linux-2.4.17)# grep -i nfs .config # CONFIG_NFS_FS is not set CONFIG_NFSD=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y

PGI installer [Was: Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody]

2002-04-16 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z wto, 16-04-2002, godz. 14:01, Branden Robinson pisze: > I'll also add that some of my time (some of it paid for by my employer) > has being going towards trying to solve a problem that people have been > complaining about even more loudly -- and for a greater duration -- than > the abse

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Craig Dickson
begin Wilmer van der Gaast quotation: > Lasse, please read the following SlashDot comment written by Branden. It > explains why Woody will not come with 4.2.0: > > http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30663&cid=3297389 > > And now feel impressed by his work. ;-) Thanks for pointing that postin

Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody

2002-04-16 Thread Craig Dickson
begin Branden Robinson quotation: > A couple of people on a recent thread in debian-devel linked to a > message I recently posted on Slashdot on this subject. I had thought > about posting this information to Debian's lists as well, but at the > time, didn't see a need. > > Thanks to that rece

Re: dialog alternatives

2002-04-16 Thread John Hasler
Jochen writes: > Sorry! Maybe I did not give your patches enough credit. The credit doesn't matter. It's just that the fact they weren't mentioned in the changelog led me to believe that they had not been applied. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin -- To U

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:14:39PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > ObPleaseDon'tFeedTheTroll http://www.bofhlet.net/trolls.txt :) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > So, I suggest that anyone, with enough knowledge and TIME, reading this, > would volunteer as XFree package maintainer. Doesn't the fact that nobody has openly volunteered to do so indicate to you that there just aren't many (any?

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 04:32:44PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > bleeding software. Brandon has added functionality to our X packages > > Run, Scott :) He also misspelled yet emphasized "definitely", so I think the fiend will be able to let it slip ;) -- 2. That which causes joy or happ

Re: ITP: libsocket++ - Socket abstraction library for C++

2002-04-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 04:15:23PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > I intent to package libsocket++, a small C++ library that abstracts > network sockets. It provides buffered reads/writes and address family > independent handling of sockets. > > I am the upstream author, this is basically split out

Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody

2002-04-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:01:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > A couple of people on a recent thread in debian-devel linked to a > message I recently posted on Slashdot on this subject. I had thought > about posting this information to Debian's lists as well, but at the > time, didn't see a n

Re: ITP: libsocket++ - Socket abstraction library for C++

2002-04-16 Thread Simon Richter
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > I intent to package libsocket++, a small C++ library that abstracts > > network sockets. It provides buffered reads/writes and address family > > independent handling of sockets. > You may want to look into the Common C++ library; it seems to do a su

Recommending non-free software

2002-04-16 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Hello, I'm the maintainer of the snd and snd-dmotif packages. In the upstream author's opinion the gtk+ version (snd) is far inferiour to the openmotif version (snd-dmotif), so I would like to add a note about that in README.Debian, so that users that don't know snd yet will install the more usef

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:57:52PM +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: >On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:03:47AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: >> Someone said that X is a difficult package to maintain and that there >> is nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed >> to install it fr

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Corrin Lakeland
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:49, Riku Voipio wrote: > I guess after seeing your messages Branden goes out for a beer > rather an opens a editor to serve ungrateful kids. Incidentially, Lasse's email did convince me that Branden's job isn't just hard, it is _really_ hard. The idea of having to deal wit

Re: Debian Press update

2002-04-16 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:19:21 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE! /me wonders why people wants to turn Debian's way (do it right, release when it is ready) into Microsof

Bug#143209: ITP: switchconf -- Change network config for laptops

2002-04-16 Thread Sebastien J. Gross
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-16 Severity: wishlist * Package name: switchconf Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.sjgross.org/app/switchconf * License : GPL Description : Change network

Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody

2002-04-16 Thread martin f krafft
Dear Branden, in the spirit of a recent email reminding us of this: Thank you. i am myself a recipient of a lot of "hate mail" and questions on why woody "sucks" simply because i've converted a *very large* number of people to debian. thanks you for writing to slashdot and for the email you just

Re: Please test this woody cd image

2002-04-16 Thread Svante Signell
Addtional boxes boot-tested with woody-isolinux: Boxdisksidepci bf24 Comapaq Presario 5640/5670 IDE OK OK Dell Dimension XPS 733rIDE OK OK Dual Celeron MSI6120 SCSI+IDE OK OK Em2 QDI Brilliant SCSI OK OK (compact tes

Re: PGI installer [Was: Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody]

2002-04-16 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:49:58PM +0200, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote: > After that introduction (sorry, just wanted You to know the situation) > let me ask You a few questions: > > First, main one: > > 0. Is PGI good enough to be used as basic installer for Debian magazine > edition which will be p

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > Someone said that X is a difficult package to maintain and that there is > nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed to > install it from sources in matter of HOURS (well, that didn't work for > me, dunno why). Based on tha

Re: ITP: libsocket++ - Socket abstraction library for C++

2002-04-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > I intent to package libsocket++, a small C++ library that abstracts > network sockets. It provides buffered reads/writes and address family > independent handling of sockets. Could you tell me why you are using -release @RELEASE@ instead

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Roger So
在 Tue, 2002-04-16 12:14, Lasse Karkkainen 寫道: > Hi! (it's my first post here) > > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE! > > Yes, it really has been three (3) months (!) since it was released. Why do people like you insists o

Re: RFC: Packaging buildd

2002-04-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper. > > Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a > rewrite in C++, based on APT, which should be ready for general use in > about three t

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-16 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:43:51AM -0400, Ashton Trey Belew wrote: > Just thought I would pipe in that I am supremely happy with the X > 4.1 package. I can only add to the discussion that XFree 4.1 also runs fine with the XFree 4.2.0 server. The server is much simpler to compile (or even NO

Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody

2002-04-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What the fuck is going on! When in this insane world did Branden become > the polite well mannered one, and I become the asshole! Uh oh, if we elect Branden DPL, is he going to switch back? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o