On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:32:48AM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
> After a bit of discussion on availability of the needed cdwriting
> equipment, etc. I have agreed to let David Downey take over
> maintainence of cdrtools. Thanks David! I'm sure everyone will
> be grateful as you fix the bugs I've
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:37:47PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 09:48, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > apt-get install libsmpeg0
> > from potato box using woody sources makes every smpeg-dependent program
> > to stop functioning. This is not technical excellence that Debian
> > enjoys.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:39:56AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> jU5T d0 apt-get install rootkit, 4n5W3r d4 q35t10nz && h4V3 fUn!!!
^^^
You misspelled "phUn". When will people learn to check their descriptions
for spelling? Arrgh.
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 22:58, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> Description : The VideoLAN Server (vls) is designed for handling a lot
> of MPEG sources and for broadcasting data over a network.
Goodie, i've been wondering how soon this would appear. It seems a lot
of work has been
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 21:20, Joey Hess wrote:
> Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a
> lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches.
Good idea, i'll bring the beer, you organize the pizza. In the past i've
always been out of town when a BSP has happened, so lets hope thi
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a
> lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches.
How about this weekend? What's required to coordinate a BSP anyway?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To
Twas 03 Apr 2002 12:45:11 +0100, and Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
realized:
> On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 22:58, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> > Description : The VideoLAN Server (vls) is designed for
> > handling a lot of MPEG sources and for
> > broadcasting data over a networ
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> Erh... Aren't there are some already @:
> http://www.videolan.org/pub/videolan/vls/0.3.1/deb/vls_0.3.1-1_i386.deb
> http://www.videolan.org/pub/videolan/vls/0.3.1/deb/vls-dvd_0.3.1-1_i386.deb
>
> Though they could do with being put in the archive and
HI,
I represent
Introversion Software (www.introversion.co.uk).
We are currently releasing our first computer game – Uplink. Uplink is a puzzle / adventure game set on
the internet of 2010. We have both
windows and Linux versions available, and we are hoping to work with var
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:18, Mark A. Morris wrote:
> I represent Introversion Software (www.introversion.co.uk).
> We are currently releasing our first computer game - Uplink. Uplink is
> a puzzle / adventure game set on the internet of 2010. We have both
> windows and Linux versions ava
#include
Adam Byrtek wrote on Wed Apr 03, 2002 um 09:12:02AM:
> #131325: cdrecord: crashes on 2.2.20
>
> It *has* to be fixed before Woody! In fact I'm still using old (1.9-1)
> cdrecord because of this bug...
Yes, it has.
Erik: What about that patch for cdrecord, needed to not to depend on th
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 08:30, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:18, Mark A. Morris wrote:
> > I represent Introversion Software (www.introversion.co.uk).
> > We are currently releasing our first computer game - Uplink. Uplink is
> > a puzzle / adventure game set on the intern
Hi debfolks
I'm using this command:
debmirror /users/debian --nosource -h -d woody
in order to have a local copy of i386 stuff for our net.
What is the damn reason why it copies potato distribution instead?
I'm missing something?
Thanks
PS: please cc me...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:01, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > > I represent Introversion Software (www.introversion.co.uk).
> > > We are currently releasing our first computer game - Uplink. Uplink is
> >
> > Let us know when you've published the source to the Demo and we'll
> > consider it.
>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a
> > lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches.
>
> How about this weekend? What's required to coordinate
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 09:50, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:01, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > > > I represent Introversion Software (www.introversion.co.uk).
> > > > We are currently releasing our first computer game - Uplink. Uplink is
> > >
> > > Let us know when you've p
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:10, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > Maybe you could run such a site and use it to promote your AwesomePlay
> > company? I doubt that your company would be seen as a competitor of
> > Introvision and they would probably be happy to work with you. Maybe
> > they'd even pay you to
Logcheck is suddenly spewing a bunch of stuff at me. I
attach an example. Mail seems to work well enough, though.
Does anybody know about this?
--
Thomas E. Vaughan
Ball Aerospace, Boulder
(303) 939-6386
Ball-internal home page: http://hypostasis/~tevaugha
--- Begin Message ---
This mail is
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 10:18, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:10, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > > Maybe you could run such a site and use it to promote your AwesomePlay
> > > company? I doubt that your company would be seen as a competitor of
> > > Introvision and they would probably be
Hi all,
one package of mine doesn't build on ia64. Namely the package is
gtkmathview 0.3.0-4 and the build log which report the failure is at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gtkmathview&ver=0.3.0-4&arch=ia64&stamp=1017745642&file=log&as=raw.
I'm asking here because the failure seems to b
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:22:39AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> but give me at least one argument why these acts cannot combine with
> a *temporary* fix uploaded to the so-called "security archives".
There are several good reasons:
- If a band-aid fix is allowed, there is less incentive to f
Mark,
I've had a third party Uplink Debian package available -
http://www.sacredchao.net/software/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/games/uplink_2_i386.deb.
The package itself is just an installer, but it can install the demo, or
off the Uplink CD, and patch an installed copy. I emailed Chris Delay
[ Followup to incomplete send. ]
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:54:25AM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> I think Wichert's position
... reflects appropriate discipline, given the (relatively modest)
severity of the problem.
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
>yes, I've seen this too, and its in the BTS already, a pointer into a
>string is being freed.
So, we have to wait and see ?
Anyway, I would like to know, if you have seen some weeks ago, I had
problem for sending mail (with mutt and ssmtp) signed with GnuPGP.
I had this error :
http://pobox.co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Aptconf will allow users to configure sources.list via debconf. It
will also contain a configlet for setting up sources.list via the
GNOME Control Center, in druids, and potentially other settings.
The architecture will treat the existing sources.list as the cano
On Wed Apr 03, 2002 at 03:52:10PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Adam Byrtek wrote on Wed Apr 03, 2002 um 09:12:02AM:
>
> > #131325: cdrecord: crashes on 2.2.20
> >
> > It *has* to be fixed before Woody! In fact I'm still using old (1.9-1)
> > cdrecord because of this bug...
>
> Yes, i
I do plan on doing a maintiner release shortly. I'm in the middle of
moving though. That's what the delay is about. Plese just give me some
time to complete this move. (tough trying to move an entire house)
I apologize for the delay.
--
David D.W. Downey ("pgpkeys") <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libpam-pg
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 18:03:14 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm asking here because the failure seems to be due to the "c++"
> compiler that doesn't recognize the "-Dsomething" option.
The toolchain was fubar on an IA64 build daemon host; see
http://bugs.debian.org/140969 .
HTH,
Ray
--
T
Looks like it doesn't matter anymore. I've been removed as the new
maitnainer by erik due to the 2 week delay.
Once again, I apologize for the delay on the package but it couldn't be
helped. Hopefully I can assist on some other package.
--
David D.W. Downey ("pgpkeys") <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libpam
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Hi debfolks
>
> I'm using this command:
>
> debmirror /users/debian --nosource -h -d woody
>
> in order to have a local copy of i386 stuff for our net.
> What is the damn reason why it copies potato distribution instead?
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 18:11, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Aptconf will allow users to configure sources.list via debconf. It
> will also contain a configlet for setting up sources.list via the
> GNOME Control Center, in druids, and potentially other settings.
Ooh
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 16:32, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> I'll go ahead an e-mail some of the game companies, if you or anyone
> else really wants to help, I can get debiangames.org registered and find
> a decent host. ^,^
We can host this on the debianplanet.org machine, which has surplus
bandwidth
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:40, Rob Bradford wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 16:32, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > I'll go ahead an e-mail some of the game companies, if you or anyone
> > else really wants to help, I can get debiangames.org registered and find
> > a decent host. ^,^
>
> We can host this
Is there anyone out there who actually appreciates the storms of
"Information received" acks that debbugs generates? If not, it is
fairly simple to turn them off - we just need to decide to do so.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software
> Is there anyone out there who actually appreciates the storms of
> "Information received" acks that debbugs generates? If not, it is
> fairly simple to turn them off - we just need to decide to do so.
I do. If lists are slow, I get an ACK back quickly, and won't wonder
for hours if my mail got
Hi!
The latest autobuild of tela failed with the following error (see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=tela&ver=1.34-4&arch=hppa&stamp=1017793182&file=log&as=raw):
objarithm.C: In function `void Min(Tobject&, const Tobject&)':
objarithm.C:1464: Internal error: Segmentation fault
Please su
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 14:18, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Is there anyone out there who actually appreciates the storms of
> "Information received" acks that debbugs generates? If not, it is
> fairly simple to turn them off - we just need to decide to do so.
I think this has come up before, but I c
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there anyone out there who actually appreciates the storms
> of "Information received" acks that debbugs generates? If not,
> it is fairly simple to turn them off - we just need to decide
> to do so.
I suspect there will be enough people on bot
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:18:57PM +0100, Mark A. Morris wrote:
> HI,
> I represent Introversion Software (www.introversion.co.uk).
> We are currently releasing our first computer game - Uplink. Uplink is
> a puzzle / adventure game set on the internet of 2010. We have both
> windows
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:20:31PM -0500, Doug Porter wrote:
> I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this
> issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having
> a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even the
> opposite). Then those who prefer to receive a
Hi Doug!
You wrote:
> I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this
> issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having
> a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even the
> opposite). Then those who prefer to receive an acknowledgement
> can mail [EMAIL PRO
Since I hated to start dselect again and again just to read a package
description I wrote a script "dsc2man" which creates appropriate man
pages for each package.
To minimize possible conflicts with other names it creates man pages in
section 6 (games!). Of course this can be configured in the co
Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this
> issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having
> a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even the
> opposite). Then those who prefer to receive an acknowledgement
>
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:38, Rob Bradford wrote:
> Ooh nice, maybe you could integrate with apt-spy or something to find
> the fastest for the user?
I don't see why not, though I'd be more inclined to add pin support
first. I had a crazy idea of doing directed graphs for country support,
so you c
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:20:31PM -0500, Doug Porter wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is there anyone out there who actually appreciates the storms
> > of "Information received" acks that debbugs generates? If not,
> > it is fairly simple to turn them off - we just n
* Otto Wyss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Since I hated to start dselect again and again just to read a package
> description I wrote a script "dsc2man" which creates appropriate man
> pages for each package.
>
> To minimize possible conflicts with other names it creates man pages in
> section 6
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:38:30PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Doug!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this
> > issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having
> > a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even the
> > opposi
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:45:29PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Since I hated to start dselect again and again just to read a package
> description I wrote a script "dsc2man" which creates appropriate man
> pages for each package.
Apart from this being quite cool, you surely know that you can read
p
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:45:29PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Since I hated to start dselect again and again just to read a package
> description I wrote a script "dsc2man" which creates appropriate man
> pages for each package.
Wouldn't it be easier to just use apt-cache show ?
--
David Roundy
h
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:20:31PM -0500, Doug Porter wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is there anyone out there who actually appreciates the storms
> > of "Information received" acks that debbugs generates? If not,
> > it is fairly simple to turn them off - we just
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:56:32AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
> I would bet that the vast majority of "flame wars" begin because someone
> mistakes "terse" or "concise" for hostility.
>
> The reverse, being the endless spewing of meaningless words, all the while
> saying nothing at all or eve
In Joerg Jaspert's email, 03-04-2002:
> Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this
> > issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having
> > a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even the
> > opposite). Then
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:00:11PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> The toolchain was fubar on an IA64 build daemon host; see
> http://bugs.debian.org/140969 .
Thanks for the pointer, all is ok now and indeed gtkmathview was
successfully built on ia64.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergr
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xpilot-ng
Version : 4.3.0X
Upstream Author : Uoti Urpala
* URL : http://xpilot.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : XPilot game "next generation"
I am the maintainer for
Previously Colin Walters wrote:
> Anyways, I personally don't like them either. But there is
> probably someone out there who does, so really our only possible
> recourse is to make it an option.
Personally I dislike them.
> This gets tricky though, because right now the BTS isn't designed to
>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:56:06PM -0600, Michael Janssen wrote:
> In Joerg Jaspert's email, 03-04-2002:
> > Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this
> > > issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having
> > > a
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:45:29PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Since I hated to start dselect again and again just to read a package
> description I wrote a script "dsc2man" which creates appropriate man
> pages for each package.
>
> To minimize possible conflicts with other names it creates man pa
also sprach Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.03.1754 +0200]:
> There are several good reasons:
>
> - If a band-aid fix is allowed, there is less incentive to find
> the correct fix.
true. doesn't mean that we have to fall into that hole.
> - If the problem isn't understood, th
also sprach Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.03.1805 +0200]:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:54:25AM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > I think Wichert's position
>
> ... reflects appropriate discipline, given the (relatively modest)
> severity of the problem.
i also have to agree with you
also sprach Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.03.0732 +0200]:
> > well, i am calm, but i disagree. sure, it boils down to the question
> > who debian's audience are, but for all i am concerned, debian's
> > reputation _used_ to include "security", and the reason why i'd (as in
> > "would
This one time, at band camp, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>Previously Colin Walters wrote:
>> This gets tricky though, because right now the BTS isn't designed to
>> do stuff depending on the submitter at all...
>
>It's simple, just stick a flag in the mail headers.
And that flag is?
--
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:51:22PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this
> > issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having
> > a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:09:27AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> this problem is understood by the developers of proftpd
Wichert said that nobody has explained why the current fix on s.d.o
doesn't work. If the problem is understood, why hasn't someone
explained this? That's all that is asked,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:06:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> because it will prevent s.d.o from serving a buggy package. it's not
> fixed perfectly, but at least it's not subject to a known exploit.
Could you be a little more careful with your terms? A DOS is not an
exploit, it's a DOS. By s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we need a better way to specify flags. Especially
because now we've got to worry about which comes first (or does
it matter)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 06:17, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:48:49AM +0200, Paul Russell wrote:
> > Looking at my testing PPC box with grep-available, we have only about
> > 8GB total Installed-Size. So I would expect a ccache of 1G
Paul Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> If this is indicative, a complete debian build would use 24GB, and I
> would say that a cache of a few GB would be a win (given not all
> packages get built as frequently).
>
> Also, a build farm could be optimized to usually build the sam
Hello,
Could someone explain to me the point of releasing
Xfree86 4.1.0-15 as is when clearly patch #065 was
going to break builds on most non-intel arches?
* patch #065: raped again by Herbert Xu and Ben Collins; you're not
"supposed to" Build-Depend on a kernel package and at the same
Hi,
"clanlib" package used to have a libclanlib.so.1, and
since yesterday or so, it now has libclanlib.so.2.
This will break upgrade from potato to woody.
I am rather doubtful if this can be fixed before woody release,
any thoughts ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Ue
Opps...that bug report associated with this
problem is 141116 not 141114...sorry.
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 03:14, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The easiest solution is probably to add a Conflicts: line to libsmpeg0
> against all the packages that used to Depend: on it in potato, which seems
> to be:
>
> Conflicts: libsmpeg-dev (<= 0.3.5-1), smpeg-gtv (<= 0.3.5-1),
>s
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:18:22PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> "clanlib" package used to have a libclanlib.so.1, and
> since yesterday or so, it now has libclanlib.so.2.
> This will break upgrade from potato to woody.
> I am rather doubtful if this can be fixed before woody release,
> any tho
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:42:24PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Hello,
>Could someone explain to me the point of releasing
> Xfree86 4.1.0-15 as is when clearly patch #065 was
> going to break builds on most non-intel arches?
Actually, the patch was applied to FIX a problem with building xfre
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:34:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Apparently, if the Linux kernel driver guys renumber some ioctls, the
> right thing is for everybody's apps to break instantly.
Err, brainfart -- scratch that point. Obviously this happens no matter
where they're defined, because
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:59:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:34:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Apparently, if the Linux kernel driver guys renumber some ioctls, the
> > right thing is for everybody's apps to break instantly.
> Err, brainfart -- scratch tha
>
> What we really should have is a nice low-level C library that encapsulates
> such things and lets anyone use it...
>
All we really need is a master ioctl header that defines the numbers. It
would be Debian specific, but what the hell.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - htt
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:04:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The kernel doesn't change ioctl numbers; they're actually competent at
> maintaining their interfaces. OTOH, they don't consider their headers
> such an interface, and they're happy to have them break randomly or not
> work from users
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:22:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:04:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The kernel doesn't change ioctl numbers; they're actually competent at
> > maintaining their interfaces. OTOH, they don't consider their headers
> > such an interfa
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:16:30AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > What we really should have is a nice low-level C library that encapsulates
> > such things and lets anyone use it...
> >
>
> All we really need is a master ioctl header that defines the numbers. It
> would be Debian specific, b
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:14:46PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:18:22PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > "clanlib" package used to have a libclanlib.so.1, and
> > since yesterday or so, it now has libclanlib.so.2.
> > This will break upgrade from potato to woody.
> > I
80 matches
Mail list logo
