Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > > "http://.../doc/apache";, while `debconf-doc' puts it under
> > > > "http://.../debconf-doc/";.
>
> I beleive the original point was that debconf-doc places its
> documentation in /usr/share/doc/debconf-doc, while apache-doc places
> its documentation in /usr/shar
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 11:35:06PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > > > "http://.../doc/apache";, while `debconf-doc' puts it under
> > > > > "http://.../debconf-doc/";.
> >
> > I beleive the original point was that debconf-doc places its
> > documentation in /usr/share/do
I'm planning a mass automated -quiet bug reporting spree against almost
all packages that depend on perl 5.00{5,4}[-base]. All such packages
should be updated to depend on perl-5.6 (possibly with 5.005 as an
alternate).
84 packages[1] would get bug reports; most are perl module packages.
Comment
Adam Lazur wrote:
> The ability to install more than one version of a package simultaneously.
Hmm. SO you install bash 2.04-1 and bash 2.02-3. Now what will be /bin/bash
2.04 or 2.02 version? You will divert both of them and symlink it to the old
name - maybe, but but how will you know, to what na
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Petr Èech wrote:
> > Some intelligence for handling multiple machines. Like the ability to nfs
> > mount /usr and have the package manager understand what's going on.
>
> sounds like something like --exclude /usr (didn't doogie implement this in 1.8
> branch?)
No, this is de
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:43:53AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> > I like using groups to give different sets of rights and I'm
> > annoyed by Debian giving every user his own group. Is that
> > reall necessary?
>
> No, but it's a good idea. It makes it much easier
Brian May wrote:
> zsh has in /etc/zshrc:
>
> [[ $UID == $GID ]] && umask 002 || umask 022
>
> My only dislike is it overrides my default setup in ~/.zshenv of 077.
> It seems wrong to put this stuff in zshrc, that only gets used for
> interactive shells. zshenv gets processed for all shells, but
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> > No, but it's a good idea. It makes it much easier to work in
> > directories shared with other users (but not all users), because
> > you don't have to keep changing your umask all the time, or
> > even worse, fixing file perm
Jeffry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> download the source, have my machine do the compile, but still have
> all the dependencies properly worked out (sort of an expanded apt-get
> -b source).
I guess you should get both the ordinary depends and the
build-depends. I fail to see where there sh
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> I always thought it was a paranoid kind of security "feature"
> in Debian. I might be wrong of course.
>
> How does giving every user his own group makes it easier for
> him to share files without system administrator's interven
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000 08:36:34 -0500, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Though maybe this program is forcing itself on the wrong interface to syslog.
>Maybe it should really be reading from a fifo, a la /dev/xconsole, rather than
>trying to read from files.
Having this, it would be impossib
When upgrading libgtk-doc glib.info.gz conflicts with the same file
from libglib1.2-dev. Which package is to remove the info file?
Preparing to replace libgtk-doc 1:1.0.6-4 (using
.../libgtk-doc_1%3a1.0.6-5_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libgtk-doc ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/ar
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 11:27:32AM +, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2000 08:36:34 -0500, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Though maybe this program is forcing itself on the wrong interface to syslog.
> >Maybe it should really be reading from a fifo, a la /dev/xconsole, rathe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description: The GNU Privacy Assistent
The GNU Privacy Assistent is a graphical user interface for the
GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG).
this program is licensed under the GPL
the package can be found at http://elxsi.de/~waldi/debian/gpa/
the original package can b
Hi
Brian May schrieb:
> > "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hamish> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 11:13:13AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >> However, the idea of one UID per daemon is (IMHO) a really
> >> horrible solution, too, as you end up having more UIDs for
>
On 00-12-25 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 01:29:44PM +, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:41:54 -0500, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >However, I would say that if the program dies so frequently that it needs a
> > >wrapper like this, it should p
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 00-12-25 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It would be nice if less included a feature to close and reopen the current
> > file. Then this would not be necessary.
>
> Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it wi
eechi von akusyumi (2000-12-24 19:03:47 +0800) :
> I would like to adopt the package gdict and maintain it. Would you
> guys ther like to give me some pointers on how should i do?
You might want to have a look at the gnome-utils package. It's
actively maintained by James LewisMoss, and it Replac
Today, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
> -F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
> logfile will be rotated, it will notice this and reopen the new current
> one and tail this one. This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hamish Moffatt) wrote on 25.12.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 08:43:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > I have a comment: NO WAY IN HELL. The day that we start rejecting DUL
> > posts is the day that several people leave the project, me included. How
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miles Bader) wrote on 24.12.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Now maybe if we were using the RBL, DUL, and RSS lists... :-)
> >
>
> GNU mailing lists (supposedly) use RBL, but in a mode where `spam' isn't
> deleted, but rather jus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Wirzenius) wrote on 24.12.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Robert van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Ignoring spam has made the internet the spam-ridden place it is right now.
>
> Spam hasn't been ignored for the past six years, thank you very much.
> It thrives regardles
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
> -F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
> logfile will be rotated, it will notice this and reopen the new current
> one and t
> You might want to have a look at the gnome-utils package. It's
> actively maintained by James LewisMoss, and it Replaces: gdict (since
> it includes it). So, you could either contact the maintainer and get
> him to re-split what was previously merged, or adopt the whole
> package, or help him m
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
eechi von akusyumi (2000-12-26 21:01:17 +0800) :
> > You might want to have a look at the gnome-utils package. It's
> > actively maintained by James LewisMoss, and it Replaces: gdict (since
> > it includes it). So, you could either contact the maintainer and get
> > him to re-split what was prev
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Description: The GNU Privacy Assistent
> The GNU Privacy Assistent is a graphical user interface for the
> GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG).
Its a nice little program, I am using this myself. Though it has one major
design flaw: every time you delete a k
Hi,
we currently have a really huge list of packages that are orphaned and
so I looked at them to see if we can drop some of them. Here are some
suggestion and my comments. Any comment from you is appreciated:
|ppd-gs (1 year and 357 days old)
Do we really need this package still for users of
Hello,
I have made a couple of packages for potato and would like
to update them to the latest upstream-version? What is the
easiest way to update the source-package?
Bye, Olaf
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Just tested that. ssh to master, telnet to localhost smtp, it was quite
> willing to relay mail with a non-local envelope. (And left enough clues in
> the header to track who did that just in case it ever becomes necessary.)
>
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 01:38:03PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> Today, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
> > -F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
> > logfile will be rotated, it w
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:05:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Did you ever wonder (assuming you even noticed) why so much spam gets sent
> to completely invalid addresss (for example, to message ids)? Because
> spamware sellers don't care if the "finely targetted" addresses they sell
> ac
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:24:34AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm planning a mass automated -quiet bug reporting spree against almost
> all packages that depend on perl 5.00{5,4}[-base]. All such packages
> should be updated to depend on perl-5.6 (possibly with 5.005 as an
> alternate).
ITYM -main
> > all packages that depend on perl 5.00{5,4}[-base]. All such packages
> > should be updated to depend on perl-5.6 (possibly with 5.005 as an
> > alternate).
I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl
recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules.
It's no use if I
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl
> recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules.
I would do, but I'm not at all sure if mod_perl works with Perl 5.6.
Last I heard, they weren't playing wel
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>> I just noticed that `apache-doc' puts the documentation under
>> "http://.../doc/apache";, while `debconf-doc' puts it under
>> "http://.../debconf-doc/";.
Joey> Eh? (Debconf-doc is a pack
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:26:07PM -, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl
> > recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules.
>
> I would do, but I'm not at all sur
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:43:13PM +0100, I wrote:
> I can verify that it works, we did a local recompile:
Maybe we did, but I can't read apt-cache output because this version
comes simply from unstable.
So no ifs and whens, it's already done and it works.
--
The idea is that the first face sho
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> |ppd-gs (1 year and 357 days old)
>
> Do we really need this package still for users of alladin ghostscript or
> is it not needed anymore?
Last time I asked for this to be removed, a few people said this was useful.
FWIW.
> |silo
Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that
all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would
be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed
here. If you want any of these packages, please look up the bug
number at http://bugs.debian.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 26 December 2000 16:50, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that
> all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would
> be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bu
On 00-12-26 Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> Today, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
> > -F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
> > logfile will be rotated, it will notice this and reopen the
On 00-12-26 Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >
> > Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
> > -F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
> > logfile will be rotated, it will notice t
On 00-12-26 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 00-12-25 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > It would be nice if less included a feature to close and reopen the
> > > current
> > > file. Then this would not be necessary.
> >
> > Well, this is a
In Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:06:08 +0100 Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
>
> On related note, it's fun to watch all the spams sent to
> @bugs.debian.org or even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> addresses. OTOH it's not fun to discover that someone spammed
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (those escape m
In Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:06:08 +0100 Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
>
> On related note, it's fun to watch all the spams sent to
> @bugs.debian.org or even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> addresses. OTOH it's not fun to discover that someone spammed
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (those escape m
Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> It's no use if I got hmm say Apache::DBI module, but perl5.6 can't find it
> because it's in 5.005 tree, and DBD::Pg hidden in 5.005 tree, that cannot
> be used by 5.6 due to some binary incompatibilities.
Um, afaik perl 5.6 is fully binary compatable, and it certianly lo
In Tue, 26 Dec 2000 15:22:21 +0100 Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum
veritate scripsit :
> |silo (195 days old)
>
> Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's
> currently still listed in the wnpp but I could find it which apt-cache
> search silo.
Wasn't this the only
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:12:19PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Or did I got completely confused and misunderstood the case?
First we need to solve the IMHO broken Alternatives Settings of those Perl
Packages. They messed up my System more than one. perl-5.6-base is removing
all the old perl a
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:26:07PM -, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> I would do, but I'm not at all sure if mod_perl works with Perl 5.6.
> Last I heard, they weren't playing well together.
Works for me with "slash". I only need to fix the Perl alternatives.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PR
A while ago I tested grub but decided against it since I needed a bios
mapping to get M$ software running and that didn't work with grub but with
lilo. Now I got myself some new hardware so I could make a complete machine
running my second disk and no need anymore to switch drives.
I copied the l
Are there any thoughts to a chroot install option for bind?? Its not
that hard to setup, but I wonder how it would fit into the debian
policy.
Nicholas
> I copied the latest grub files to /boot/grub reinstalled and rebooted. but
> grub won't boot my machine. All I get is the message "Loading stage1.5" and
> then the machine stands still. No error message whatsoever. Using lilo or a
> boot floppy as works well.
Hm, have you tried running grub-ins
could you please mail me sheet music for dueling banjos
> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Svante> When upgrading libgtk-doc glib.info.gz conflicts with the
Svante> same file from libglib1.2-dev. Which package is to remove
Svante> the info file?
That's weird. From the control file:
Package: libglib1.2-dev
Archite
> "Kim" == Kim Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kim> could you please mail me sheet music for dueling banjos
This is about the third or fourth time we've gotten this request.
Does anyone know why? :) (Here's an earlier one I found.)
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 12:06:26 +0100
From: Martin
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Kim Richards wrote:
>
> could you please mail me sheet music for dueling banjos
>
me too.
hmm... what next, messages about natalie portman's naked & petrified hot
grits?
Today, Kim Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could you please mail me sheet music for dueling banjos
And before you post a witty comment, please search through the list
archives to make sure you don't duplicate effort.
Let the jokes begin!
--
Andreas Fuchs, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROT
At 01:18 PM 12-26-2000 -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> "Kim" == Kim Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kim> could you please mail me sheet music for dueling banjos
This is about the third or fourth time we've gotten this request.
Does anyone know why? :) (Here's an earlier one I found.)
I
Hi all,
I've noticed something that seems odd to me.
On ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/source
theres a bunch of files (.dsc .diff .orig etc) appearing in this
directory.
Is this the correct behaviour? Is this related to the switch to
package pools?
I'm curious because the same thing isn
DuEling BANjos, I'd presume. Probably some search engine specializing in
"sound-alikes" for lousy spellers...
On 26 Dec 2000, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > "Kim" == Kim Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Kim> could you please mail me sheet music for dueling banjos
>
> This is about
from the secret journal of Buddha Buck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> At 01:18 PM 12-26-2000 -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > > "Kim" == Kim Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Kim> could you please mail me sheet music for dueling banjos
> >
> >This is about the third or fourth time we've
Peter Eckersley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 12:15:50AM -0800, Erik Winn wrote:
> > Here is the first obstacle - not really a big one, but I spent all day
> > digging around and couldn't really find any tools for this one: we want to
> > be
> > able to clone the machines easily over the lo
Hi Olaf!
You wrote:
> I have made a couple of packages for potato and would like
> to update them to the latest upstream-version? What is the
> easiest way to update the source-package?
Use uupdate. This is descriped in the new-maintainers guide i think.
BTW: this is a question for debian-men
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:41:02PM +, John O Sullivan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've noticed something that seems odd to me.
> On ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/source
> theres a bunch of files (.dsc .diff .orig etc) appearing in this
> directory.
> Is this the correct behaviour? Is this r
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Olaf!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > I have made a couple of packages for potato and would like
> > to update them to the latest upstream-version? What is the
> > easiest way to update the source-package?
>
> Use uupdate. This is descriped in the new-maint
Hi,
Remco van de Meent wrote:
> > > Many packages compiled against X3 seem to include this directory in
> > > their package.
> >
> > Yes. They need to move their app-defaults files.
> >
> > > What should I do?
> >
> > File bugs against packages that use /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults.
>
> Whe
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:30:47AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > For the record, right now I'm the primary reason why the spam in the BTS
> > `magically' disappears, once it's reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
>
> I've seen one in lyx-cjk bugs. It's cosmetically annoying.
> I really would love t
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 08:41:43PM +, Mark Seaborn wrote:
> "Dwayne C . Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
>
> I want a system where I can install multiple versions of a library (or
> any package really) and say which
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
ANTLR can be download from www.antlr.org, you need to enter in some
details to download the tarball.
ANTLR is:
ANTLR, ANother Tool for Language Recognition, (formerly PCCTS) is a
language tool that provides a framework for constructing recognizers,
compilers, and
I thought it was some metaphor for SMP
> DuEling BANjos, I'd presume. Probably some search engine specializing in
> "sound-alikes" for lousy spellers...
>
> On 26 Dec 2000, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
>
> > > "Kim" == Kim Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Kim> could you please mai
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> |silo (195 days old)
>
> Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's
> currently still listed in the wnpp but I could find it which apt-cache
> search silo.
You can only remove this if you want sparc to be
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 06:59:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >
> > |silo (195 days old)
> >
> > Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's
> > currently still listed in the wnpp but I could find it which ap
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 02:52:33PM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:41:02PM +, John O Sullivan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I've noticed something that seems odd to me.
> > On ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/source
> > theres a bunch of files (.dsc .diff .orig etc) ap
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:26:17AM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> My sponsor and I are only waiting for some consensus to be reached
> before he uploads the package. Consider this to be a RFC / CFD / CFV
> / whatever. If noone reacts, I guess we'll consider that the
> consensus has been reached o
Bzzt! mentioned three times by my recollection in the "dualling
banjos" thread. Half the distance to the goal line, loss of down: second
down!
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, John Leuner wrote:
> I thought it was some metaphor for SMP
>
> > DuEling BANjos, I'd presume. Probably some search engine specia
If it's so important, why is it orphaned? I'm thinking that if the SPARC
folx can't be bothered to maintain their bootloader, perhaps the port's
utilization of resources needs to be called into question... What's the
point in Debian proper showing more support for SPARC than the SPARC
community
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:00:56AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > > Yes. They need to move their app-defaults files.
[...]
> > > File bugs against packages that use /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults.
[...]
> It seems like noone ever sent any bug rapport about this, right? I'm
> maintaining xfaces and
How do you start Linux via grub with frame buffer enabled?
On a system with a Matrox video card, I have got it going fine (with Matrox
FB driver).
However, on this computer, where I need to use the VESA driver, nothing
I have tried seems to work.
At the moment I have:
kernel (hd0,0)/boot/vmlinu
Hello,
I seem to have problems booting Linux 2.2.18 via NFS root
image. **2.2.17 works fine**, but 2.2.18 says "No NFS servers
available, giving up". It tries to mount root from the floppy disk,
and as expected panics when it can't (floppy disk I/O is compiled as a
module). It doesn't even try to
Package: wnpp
Serverity: ITP
Jakarta Regexp is one of regular expression library for Java.
It's simpler than Jakarta ORO.
URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/regexp/
LICENSE: Apache Software License 1.1(BSD style)
---
Takashi Okamoto
"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote:
> I'm starting work on a new linux package manager. The idea is to be able to
> replace rpm, dpkg, apt, dselect (backend) with one,written mostly from scratch
> and designed to be as simple (code, not features) and clean as possible. For
> now, the work will be s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicholas Lee) writes:
> Are there any thoughts to a chroot install option for bind?? Its not
> that hard to setup, but I wonder how it would fit into the debian
> policy.
I've been thinking about it after 9.1.0 releases, and after I add debconf
support. I don't run chroot'ed,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:50:58PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> RFA: gdict -- small GTK app to retrieve definitions from MIT's dictionary
> server
Ummm...
it *seems* like gdict has been swallowed by gnome-utils.
If that weren't the case, I would have volunteered.
--
|> |= -+- |= |>
| |
84 matches
Mail list logo
