> dinstall, the software which installs packages into the hierarchy, can
> now announce packages and close bugs for you.
Ah, you beat me to it! I was planning to work on this one next week ;-)
Well done!!
> dinstall will announce to debian-changes and/or debian-devel-changes
> as appropriate. I
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 14:29:46 +0100, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have to say we are very far in the deep-freeze to consider
> breaking the dpkg-packge apart..
Actually, I'm just advocating the removal of the disk methods.
The only really release critical bit of this report is to
> Adam Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmm, is it really a good thing to have dinstall announce the uploads? I
> > often depend on the announcements to alert me to new versions in Incoming.
> > In the new setup, the announcements won't come until the package is
> > installed, which in som
I wrote:
> Power, speed, and freedom: a wild horse.
Joseph Carter writes:
> That's been taken...
Has been taken by... ?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Stampede Linux
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 06:31:52PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Power, speed, and freedom: a wild horse.
>
> Joseph Carter writes:
> > That's been taken...
>
> Has been taken by... ?
> --
> John Hasler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood,
This is kinda neat, considering what we were talking about with libtool
and all, examine this ldd output:
Wakko{jgg}~/work/apt#ldd `which wmakerconf `
libgdk_imlib.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgdk_imlib.so.1 (0x4000f000)
libgtk.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgtk.so.1 (0x40031000)
libgdk.so.1
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Question: Would this system be useful to others? If so, how do you
> suggest that I release it? I have a certain amount of ftp space
> available to me, enough that I could put up a full binary and source
> release.
You've already had a
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:20:00PM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> > Previously Brian White wrote:
> > > apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files
> > > [0] (Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> >
> > We should just force SymLinksIfOwnerMatch for /home to solve this.
>
>
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 01:16:49PM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
> > > Also, does it check that the bug it's closing actually is related to
> > > one of the packages in the upload to avoid the eminent typos?
>
> No, but it's not as if I've increased the danger of typos. Before you
> might have sent email
> > You know, I don't see this as "grave". It means that a user can
> > effectively "export to the world" any file readable by www-data. In
> > general, this means only things that can be read by public. So,
> > the user can't intentionally export anything that he/she couldn't already
> > do by
> > > Previously Brian White wrote:
> > > > apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files
> > > > [0] (Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > >
> > > We should just force SymLinksIfOwnerMatch for /home to solve this.
> >
> > You know, I don't see this as "grave". It mea
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:10:25PM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> I understand. My point, however, was that anyone who exports those things
> on purpose could just as easily copy the file, ftp it, email it, or
> whatever. Plugging a whole in the side of a boat doesn't help when the
> boat has no bot
I wrote:
> Power, speed, and freedom: a wild horse.
Erick Kinnee writes:
> Stampede Linux
Stampede? I would have expected something to do with cattle.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > jdk1.132548 Java doesn't work at all for me on slink [0]
> > (Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
This bug should probably be downgraded. Java works fine without the
named script. I looked into performing an N
Amos Shapira wrote:
(B>
(B> On Sun, January 31 1999, Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
(B> te:
(B> |packages from potato. I am running the mule xemacs. Do we fill a bug
(B> |report against gnuserv ?
(B>
(B> I've already filed a bug report against gnuserv on October 19th:
(B> http://
Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I took the sources to cfdisk.c, ripped all the user interface code
> out, and replaced it with code that essentially does the following:
You should try using sfdisk instead for things like this. It's the
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:11:54PM -0600, Jonel Rienton wrote:
>
> Slink's latest lprng is broken, it's give me a problem about permission or
> something'.
Best to submit a bug. Make sure to make it "important".
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I took the sources to cfdisk.c, ripped all the user interface code
> out, and replaced it with code that essentially does the following:
You should try using sfdisk instead for things like this. It's the
best of {s,c,}fdisk, but it has no frontend.
Guy
Slink's latest lprng is broken, it's give me a problem about permission or
something'.
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 12:25:10PM -0700, Bear Giles wrote:
> On a related note, I noticed that 'cops' is absent. Again, is this
> deliberate or does it need a maintainer?
AFAIK noone ever proposed packaing it. So go ahead and do it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49e
NetStreamer is Internet Radio at its finest (=. There is a server, a
transmitter, and a reciever -- all following the radio station analogy.
The Server listens for receivers and also sends out the transmitters data.
the transmitter(s) take audio from stdin, /dev/{audio,dsp}, or .tape files and
se
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 00:23:14 +0100, Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm currently writting an article for an online magazine
> based on free software proyects called OpenResources
> (www.openresources.com) who where interested in having a preview of
> what Slink will
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > general 28850 gettext: security problem when used in setuid
> > programs [0] (debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
>
> Everyone who has a package with a setuid program or something that runs
> as root should check if it uses gettext, and if so recompile it with
>
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> Previously Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> > Is there any way of changing that default behaviour (e.g. some config
> > file) apart from recompiling dpkg? I'd like to leave it disabled at all
> > times no matter what the default is in the current dpkg
Hello.
I am about to package sniffit since it has been
orphaned and wnpp also says it is free. Now if
nobody is working on it already I will take it.
Alexander
--
The books that the world calls immoral are the books
that show the world it's own shame. -- Oscar Wilde
Alexander Koch - <>< - aka
Hi,
>>"Guy" == Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Guy> In your changelog, the perl regular expression
Guy> /closes:\s*(bug)?\#\d+(,\s*(bug)?\#\d+)*/i is used to build the
Guy> Closes field. Here is an example:
Note: the regular expression does not allow for a space
between `bug' an
I may have old versions of a lot of packages (most come from hamm),
however, this behaviour of fakeroot has me very puzzled, and I wondered
what is going on??? Is this something to do with buggy signal
handling putting the foreground zsh process into the background??
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Gilbey) writes:
> There was a suggestion a while back for the .changes file to have two
> fields, a Maintainer field and an Uploader field. If these are
> identical, then it's a maintainer upload, otherwise it's an NMU. If
> there's no Uploader field, then fall back to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Gilbey) writes:
> There was also the idea of running the announcement part of dinstall
> every ten minutes or thereabouts.
I could announce new packages as they're processed. (They'd be
announced twice then.) Are people actually sitting around all day
waiting for new p
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I remember having looked at it but, IIRC, the source was less
> comprehensible, which at the time was the most important thing.
I don't think you would have to make any changes. It's design to be
easily run from scripts.
Guy
I've recently switched to Window Maker as my window manager. I'm also
trying a bunch of dock apps, kinda like a kid in a candy store.
Anyway, the I've decided to maintain a few of them as packages if
they're not already taken.
They are:
wmWeather - local weather per airport weather system
wmSpa
Hrmm -- several points/questions here.
1) now that I'm a maintainer, if chameleon is still available, I'll go
ahead and adopt it.
2) *wince* -- since becoming a maintainer, I've modified my key... I
added my debian.org email and removed my whitestar.soark.net email from my
key -- and changed my
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, are spaces legal, or not?
Oops. The regular expression is correct, and the example is not.
There may not be a space between `bug' and `#'.
Guy
Joey Hess wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > general 28850 gettext: security problem when used in setuid
> > > programs [0] (debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
> >
> > Everyone who has a package with a setuid program or something that runs
> > as root should check if it uses gettext,
Quoting Oscar Levi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:11:54PM -0600, Jonel Rienton wrote:
> >
> > Slink's latest lprng is broken, it's give me a problem about permission or
> > something'.
>
> Best to submit a bug. Make sure to make it "important".
32628 was submitted 30 Jan. It
Hello
My name is Pierre Ljungberg and I have a little problem. I have a domex
UW SCSI controller and UW SCSI disk that I would like to install Debian
on, but the controller is not supported by Your distribution install
disk.
However I have downloaded a patch for the kernel to make the controller
i
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 12:46:05PM +0100, Pierre Ljungberg wrote:
> Hello
>
> My name is Pierre Ljungberg and I have a little problem. I have a domex
> UW SCSI controller and UW SCSI disk that I would like to install Debian
> on, but the controller is not supported by Your distribution install
> d
i intend to package rtjpeg and vstream: rtjpeg is real time jpeg compressor with
client/server mechanisms to allow running a BTTV card over a network using ~1/10
of 10BaseT bandwidth; and vstream is an app targeted at making mpeg movies from
a
BTTV stream.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 12:05:27PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > > general 28850 gettext: security problem when used in setuid
> > > > programs [0] (debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
> > >
> > > Everyone who has a package with a setuid
Here is the announcement of the logo contest I intend to send out later
today, since the gimp contest starts today. If anyone has commments
please tell me about them so I can make changes.
--
As you might know Debian GNU
On Saturday 30 January 1999, at 16 h 41, the keyboard of Paul Seelig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, let's be serious again: unfortunately this actually means that
> some of the most obvious installation profiles of slink stay to be
> unnecessarily bloated.
Giving the size of the current pro
Hi !
I would like to package the Perl module "Net::RawIP".
It is, like the name suggests, a low level Networking module. It allows you
to create any kind of IP package and gives special support for TCP, UDP and
ICMP. There is even raw Ethernet support.
This package makes it possible to write "t
On Saturday 30 January 1999, at 23 h 31, the keyboard of Larry Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The professor asked me to find out :
> "What is distinctive about Debian Linux development that affects
> its assurance? "
As a recent Debian developer (Sep. 1998), let me give my opinion:
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 1999 12:29 AM
> To: Jason Gunthorpe
> Cc: Debian Developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What hack in ld.so?
>
>
> On Jan 30, 1999, Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If
Previously John Hasler wrote:
> Has been taken by... ?
Stampede Linux iirc.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leide
Previously Jonel Rienton wrote:
> Slink's latest lprng is broken, it's give me a problem about permission or
> something'.
Vincent already uploaded a fix for that.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a messa
Previously Brian White wrote:
> Hmmm... If things were installed by hand ("dpkg --install dpkglib...")
> or if install were to fail between the two packages, then you could have
> a problem where the install tool doesn't function, right?
Right. But since libdpkg is still a part of the dpkg packag
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:54:20AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > > xbase 30852 X packages do not upgrade automatically due to name change.
> > > > [41] (Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> [...]
> >
> > There's supposed to be a new versio
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Brinkmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 1999 12:53 AM
> To: Jason Gunthorpe; Alexandre Oliva
> Cc: Debian Developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What hack in ld.so?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 04:06:04PM -0700, J
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Matzigkeit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 1999 5:41 AM
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Ian's solution [was: What hack in ld.so?]
>
>
> Hi, all!
>
> There's been so much traffic on this thread, th
On Feb 1, 1999, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once more this proves that -rpath is harmful: If Devian use -rpath thsi
> will *force* the other distribution makers to place Devian-specific
> stuff in /dev (and if Devian was crazy, placing standard stuff in /dev,
> their programs
Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But dpkg-multicd is more than multiple-cds. There's multi-nfs,
> multi-mount, ... that replace nfs, mounted, ...
> That's why we think dpkg default methods can be removed/extracted to a
> different package.
Ok, I didn't realize this. If the multi-mou
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 1999 11:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> debian-devel@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: -rpath with libtool and Debian Linux
>
>
On Feb 1, 1999, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that I want to be able to obtain with libtool the
> same service I can obtain usually without it (although with a lot
> more difficulties): Build shared libraries and executables, that
> will work on various libc5 or l
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 1999 11:39 PM
> To: Buddha Buck
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe; Debian Developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What hack in ld.so?
>
>
> On Jan 29, 1999, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 1, 1999, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In general, it's convenient to store the path in the executable any
>> time a shared library is installed in a directory which the dynamic
>> linker does not search by default.
> Especially if it is related to the executable. If it
On Feb 1, 1999, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since modifying the next release of libtool won't contribute at all to
>> fix the problem in already compiled programs, which are the only
>> programs affected by this problem
> I usually still build production code with a libc5 se
I've had a brief look at this; would anyone like to take a closer look
?
Ian.
--- Begin Message ---
--- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ---
Received: from optima.cs.arizona.edu (optima.CS.Arizona.EDU [192.12.69.5])
by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.9.1a/8.9.1) wi
I intend to package GoldED when my developer-application processes
From freshmeat appindex:
GoldED is a very nice console full-screen mail/newsreader for
Fidonet and Internet. It is one of the best of it's kind for
Fidonet and quite usable for Internet. For Internet mail and news
you need a pr
On Sunday 31 January 1999, at 0 h 48, the keyboard of Michael Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > boot-floppies 32269 partion harddisk fails if WIN95_EXTENDED present
> > [0] (Enrique Zanardi )
>
> The report log is a little unclear. It looks like there is a version of cfdisk
> that work
Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I remember having looked at it but, IIRC, the source was less
> comprehensible, which at the time was the most important thing.
I don't think you would have to make any changes. It's design to be
easily
Oscar Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my opinion, this problem is not sufficient to warrant an upload at
> this time since, contrary to the bug reporters claim, it does not
> prevent the packing from functioning. It is annoying, yes.
Interesting that it works for you. It really doesn't fo
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I've had a brief look at this; would anyone like to take a closer look
> ?
Not only the correct URL seem to be http://WWW.VEDOVANET.BBK.ORG/linux/vedova/,
but given the filenames and directory layouts it rather seems based on
Slackware than Debian... ;)
> > Hmmm... If things were installed by hand ("dpkg --install dpkglib...")
> > or if install were to fail between the two packages, then you could have
> > a problem where the install tool doesn't function, right?
>
> Right. But since libdpkg is still a part of the dpkg package we
> shouldn't nee
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote:
[ intent to package snipped ]
Is there a URL for this, or is the code only available via supernatural
revelation?
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.midco.net
finger [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Monday 1 February 1999, at 10 h 54, the keyboard of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E. Martin) wrote:
> java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/../bin/i686/green_threads/java
...
> The binary is somehow actually missing, and I've not done anything weird as
> far as I know. The other folks who are
Hi !
I wonder if there was already a discussion about what to do with all those
CPAN libraries. Should we package all of them (naaa...) or only the best,
or none of them (oohhh :-().
Or should we create some "Big-Packages" i.e. say the user "ok, you can get
CPAN/Networking of CPAN/Databases but
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 03:42:06PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>
> Power, speed, and freedom: a wild horse.
Just like Stampede has it?
Marcus
--
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god."Debian GNU/Linuxfinger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.orgmaster.debian
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 04:16:39PM +0100, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen wrote:
> I intend to package GoldED when my developer-application processes
>
> From freshmeat appindex:
> GoldED is a very nice console full-screen mail/newsreader for
> Fidonet and Internet. It is one of the best of it's kind f
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> ... we would like to have two logos:
> one logo with a very liberal license that everyone is free to use (for example
> on things like webpages, shirts, etc.), and a more official logo with a
> restricted license which can only be used on more official things (like Cd's
Hi!
Speaking for myself as a Debian maintainer (not a libtool maintainer):
Alexandre is angry because we have deliberately chosen not to fully
implement Red Hat's ugly (and effective) ld.so hack, but yet we also
claim that we're ``just following what everybody else is doing,'' and
that none of th
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 08:23:24AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > I intend to package GoldED when my developer-application processes
> >
> > From freshmeat appindex:
> > GoldED is a very nice console full-screen mail/newsreader for
> > Fidonet and Internet. It is one of the best of it's kind fo
Hi,
when I tried to have a look at gnome-apt_0.3_i386.deb
I found that it depends on several potato packages.
I tried to install as much as needed (well, as the deb dependencies
indicate) but still get some missing so dependencies:
# gnome-apt
gnome-apt: error in loading shared libraries
libgtk-1
On 1999/02/01, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Monday 1 February 1999, at 10 h 54, the keyboard of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E. Martin) wrote:
> > java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/../bin/i686/green_threads/java
> ...
> > The binary is somehow actually missing, and I've not done anything
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Thomas Gebhardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I tried to have a look at gnome-apt_0.3_i386.deb
> I found that it depends on several potato packages.
> I tried to install as much as needed (well, as the deb dependencies
> indicate) but still get some missing so dependencies:
>
> # gno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E. Martin) writes:
> Oscar Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In my opinion, this problem is not sufficient to warrant an upload at
> > this time since, contrary to the bug reporters claim, it does not
> > prevent the packing from functioning. It is annoying, yes.
> In
> "Stephane" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephane> Sam's message indicates that the i686 directory is
Stephane> used. Since the name includes a ".." could it be a symbolic
Stephane> link problem? Sam, any symlink in /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin? Any
Stephane> chance when deinstal
On 1/02, Steve Dunham wrote:
|
| I have the same problem. The file does show up in "dpkg -L":
|
|/usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/i686/green_threads/java
|
| But on the filesystem, the i686 directory is a symlink to the i586
| directory, and i586/green_threads is empty. Perhaps this is a bug in
| dpkg
> jdk1.1 works for me on a slink machine. It is true that Java on Debian seems
> poorly supported and the maintainers overloaded.
>
I'll do an NMU to avoid the warning...but only if we (read as Brian)
deem it necessary for release.
On 01-Feb-99 Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote:
>
> [ intent to package snipped ]
>
> Is there a URL for this, or is the code only available via supernatural
> revelation?
Only the truly blessed may wonder upon its blessed page ..
No (=
http://flits102-126.flit
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 06:04:45PM +0100, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 08:23:24AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > > I intend to package GoldED when my developer-application processes
> > >
> > > From freshmeat appindex:
> > > GoldED is a very nice console full-screen m
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > > general 28850 gettext: security problem when used in setuid
> > > > programs [0] (debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
> > >
> > > Everyone who has a package with a setuid program or somethin
The reinstall may coerce some missing files to be properly installed.
It doesn't fix the checkVersions warning. On inspecting the source I
find the script. It claims to be part of the Linux port of the jdk
and not from the sun sources. It is the debian/rules files that
deletes it.
To make the s
"Phillip R. Jaenke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A bit of history first, as it is somewhat important. For those of you who
> don't know; Linux runs on PowerPC's. Yes. It does. Now, what big names do
> we know that have PowerPC based systems? Let's see. Apple. Amiga. UMax.
> IBM RS/6000 (RISC Sys
> > > nonus.debian.org 23780 nonus.debian.org: libssl-dev is obsolete [220]
> > > (Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> ...
> > Will non-us ever be fixed?
>
> It is but I'm afraid the bugs have not been closed. Heiko seems really
> overloaded (and does not reply a lot even on other subje
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is kinda neat, considering what we were talking about with libtool
> and all, examine this ldd output:
>
> Wakko{jgg}~/work/apt#ldd `which wmakerconf `
> libgdk_imlib.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgdk_imlib.so.1 (0x4000f000)
> libgtk.so.1
On 1 Feb 1999, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> In short, we have only three choices, regardless of what happens in
> libtool:
>
> 1) Implement Red Hat's ugly patch in our libc5 ld.so, and thereby be
>bugwards compatible with everybody else's Linux.
> 2) Find some other way to make -rpath on Debi
On 1 Feb 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
> > And note that it links to libglib twice. Turns out this is because there
> > is two 'gdk-imlib1' packages with the same soname but linked against
> > different versions of glib! By my count we have 72 different package that
> > depend on gdk-imlib1..
>
> I made
the rationale behind two logos is that one is a "debian is cool" logo and
another is a "this is official debian" logo. they should look different
enough that you can tell whether someone is merely praising debian or
actually shipping it. i agree, though, that there should be no restriction
that the
> "Steve" == Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> But on the filesystem, the i686 directory is a symlink to
Steve> the i586 directory, and i586/green_threads is empty.
Steve> Perhaps this is a bug in dpkg? (I suspect that if you
Steve> remove the jdk1.1 package and r
On 1 Feb 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
> > I somehow sense that slink/potato gtk/gnome is going to be painfull..
>
> I agree. I'm only planning to support Gnome 0.99.x/1.0 on potato.
Oh, I was just reminded of this on the dpkg list.. The gtk (gdk? I forget)
library packages have been internationalized
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package
> uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the hit count for
> people maintining multiple binary packages.
Well, I might have made it on the list if you weighted by compi
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1 Feb 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > > And note that it links to libglib twice. Turns out this is because there
> > > is two 'gdk-imlib1' packages with the same soname but linked against
> > > different versions of glib! By my count we have 72 differ
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 02:26:18PM -0500, Jonathan P Tomer wrote:
> i agree, though, that there should be no restriction
> that the logos actually chosen must both be drawn by the same person.
I sincerley hpoe that we will have enough taste to choose a consistent set,
and not two distinct, random
First, we build this large badger...
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
[ Congratulations! ]
Guy Maor:
> dinstall will look for a Format field of 1.6 and a new Closes field.
Is the 1.6 format required for the automatic announcement?
If yes: Would not be better to always announce it, regardless of
the format?
--
"a87a357fb4f02064e32569602502da28" (a truly random s
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1 Feb 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > > I somehow sense that slink/potato gtk/gnome is going to be painfull..
> >
> > I agree. I'm only planning to support Gnome 0.99.x/1.0 on potato.
>
> Oh, I was just reminded of this on the dpkg list.. The gtk (
"Phillip R. Jaenke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why a dolphin? Well, they're intelligent. Definitely
> intelligent. They're pretty cute. :) And they're definitely
> flexible. (I'd like to see *you* burst out of the water, do a
> backflip or two midair, and make a perfect reentry.;)
Right, and t
"Alexander N. Benner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok .. beat me for this .. but it does not realy meen 'good bye and
> thankyou for the fish' ! Dolphins are not more intelligent then paes
> or other animals. Intelligence referes also to somewhat of abstract
> thinking which no animal has.
Um.
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 06:46:49PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > nonus.debian.org 23780 nonus.debian.org: libssl-dev is obsolete [220]
> > > > (Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > ...
> > > Will non-us ever be fixed?
> >
> > It is but I'm afraid the bugs have not been closed. Hei
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
