Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master

1999-01-29 Thread Richard Braakman
Joey Hess wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > xfree86 (3.3.2.3a-9) frozen unstable; urgency=medium > > . > > ./xbase/changelog 3.3.2-4: 143 > ... (other binary packages with same 143 line changelog and same source) > ./lintian/changelog 0.3.0: 139 I Will Try Harder. :-) Richard Braakman

Re: Packages I am orphaning.

1999-01-29 Thread Joel Klecker
At 17:11 +0100 1999-01-29, Remco van de Meent wrote: Joel Klecker wrote: pciutils - Utils for listing/tweaking PCI devices in 2.1/2.2 kernels Bug-free, lintian-clean There are some upstream alpha releases that would be nice to have packaged so

Re: -rpath with libtool and Debian Linux

1999-01-29 Thread Joel Klecker
At 15:41 -0600 1999-01-29, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote: The best solution I can come up with is to *always* change a library's soname when its dependencies change. I believe it was Joel Klecker who mentioned something about `libapi' patches for egcs that were supposed to implement this automatically.

Article introducing Slink

1999-01-29 Thread Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
I'm currently writting an article for an online magazine based on free software proyects called OpenResources (www.openresources.com) who where interested in having a preview of what Slink will offer. However, I'm at a loss to grasp all the differences between Hamm and Slink, and w

seeking new maintainer: lilo

1999-01-29 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, who would liek to take the lilo package over? There are a few pending bugs, most of the dealing with the lack of an intelligent install script (which should be included in the bootfloppies, too). Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,d

stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-01-29 Thread Joey Hess
Vincent Renardias wrote: > Since you seem to be in this kind of statistics, you may want to try to > find out which developers are the most productive (ie: have done the > highest number of uploads) ;) Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package uploads, not binary pac

Re: Article introducing Slink

1999-01-29 Thread Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
Sorry to reply to myself... I just wanted to note that the article is incomplete, and translated from the original (also incomplete ;) in spanish. I will try to finish it more and translate it tomorrow.. I have added to it: - information on apt's future frontend (I do not

Re: seeking new maintainer: lilo

1999-01-29 Thread Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
I do not feel confident enough to take upon lilo, I just wanted to say that I was working (sorry Enrique for not being able to finish it for slink) in a LILO installation to be included in boot-floppies and work also standalone, if anyone is working in it feel free to contact me so we cou

Re: seeking new maintainer: lilo

1999-01-29 Thread Buddha Buck
--On Saturday, January 30, 1999, 12:35 AM +0100 "Bernd Eckenfels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > who would liek to take the lilo package over? I might, but I have a couple of questions/concerns... I am not registerred as a developer. If that is an immediate show-stopper, then so be i

Re: stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-01-29 Thread David Welton
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 03:44:25PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source > package uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the > hit count for people maintining multiple binary packages. Well, often times, those packages are more

<    1   2