On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 09:53:16PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Problem is, you'll never be able to convince a DOS user of a text editor
> with different modes. Sorry, I don't think a dumb newbie should be able to
> install a workstation, but he should be able to install the base system and
> p
Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
No, but you can run fetchmail within ssh 'tunnel'.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] According to the latest official figures,
http://rosebud.ml.org/~edd 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On 13 Jun 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >Sounds like it should go in extra, for now.
>
> OTOH our news server didn't survive longer then a day with 2.0.[0-3] and
> runs rockstable with 2.0.34 ...
My machine has been running .34 for two days now, I have a proxy server at
work that has be
On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
>
> No, but you can run fetchmail within ssh 'tunnel'.
Yeah, but I need to support netscape mail under Lose95...
Tim
--
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / (home) [EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 12:03:34AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'd like to receive some help. The program gets called with the
> following command
>
> /usr/bin/java JavaLex.Main $*
>
> The main problem is that there is no JavaLex.Main file. It is not
> included in the .tar.gz nor in the .d
And thus spake Tim Sailer, on Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:58:25PM -0400:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
> >
> > No, but you can run fetchmail within ssh 'tunnel'.
>
> Yeah, but I need to support nets
Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, but I need to support netscape mail under Lose95...
There's a command line version of ssh that runs under win32
(I've used it under NT, I never run '95), that will do
port redirects (which would allow you to tunnel the pop
port).
--
Raul
--
To UNSU
On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 09:53:24PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> And thus spake Tim Sailer, on Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:58:25PM -0400:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > >
> > > Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
> > >
> > > No, but you
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: What will you record as fixing-version ?
If we reorganize the server the way I've been discussing recently, this
problem would go away... because no package could ever get into a stable
tree without going through unstable... one version stream should
Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, and it's an ugly method, and costs $99/seat. Netscape has
> native support for SSL. I'm trying to avoid clear passwords
> across the network. Eudora and qpopper support apop, but netscape
> doesn't... sheesh..
Well, there's the whole mozilla thing you c
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > ... but there are times when you
> > just have to make a clean break. Going between libc versions was one
> > of those times, as was going from a.out to elf. Otherwise, what are
> > major number changes for?
>
> This is simply not true. When we moved
After carefully reading over the license of Mysql it seems like it could
be included in the main
distribution area.
I am wondering exactly what parts are preventing it from being
included.
Is it that you must purchase it if you wish to develop commercial
applications that require it?
Truefully
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:01:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'd like to offload some of the admin stuff for the bug system.
>
> I don't know how Guy (the other admin of the bug system) feels, but
> I'd like to reduce the amount of time I spend running the bug system.
As there were enough peopl
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 11:14:19PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> Many of us send a mail when going off-line for some time. This is
> however quite informal: these anouncements are posted once in -devel,
> once in -private; mainly there is no automated way of tracking them.
Please contact netgod
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> Is it that you must purchase it if you wish to develop commercial
> applications that require it?
And that you cannot sell it.
--
Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's practically impossible to look at a
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 01:48:58AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> After carefully reading over the license of Mysql it seems like it could
> be included in the main
> distribution area.
>
> I am wondering exactly what parts are preventing it from being
> included.
>
> Is it that you must purcha
here is a test image. on my 2.1 kernel it works well :
total 2
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 45 Jun 13 12:23 TRANS.TBL
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root3 Jun 13 12:22 bar -> foo
on a plain 2.0.33 it doesn't work well :
total 1
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 45 Jun 13 1998
sorry, here is the test image. :-(((
andreas
test.raw.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
I just uploaded an NMU of ssh to non-us. It fixes a
nasty security bug where anyone could inject data
into an encrypted ssh stream. I suggest you upgrade
ASAP. The files can be found for now at
ftp://nonus.debian.org/pub/incoming/debian-non-US/
On 13 Jun 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org (pseudo)
> Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 22978 Please move ircii from main to non-free
This one can be closed. IrcII is now free.
Greg
--
Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> On 13 Jun 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > Package: ftp.debian.org (pseudo)
> > Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 22978 Please move ircii from main to non-free
>
> This one can
Bdale Garbee wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> : What will you record as fixing-version ?
> If we reorganize the server the way I've been discussing recently, this
> problem would go away... because no package could ever get into a stable
> tree without going through unstab
Yesterday, 12 Jun 1998, I uploaded dict-foldoc-19980612, which
included a new upstream version. After uploading it, I realized that
dpkg-buildpackage had treated it as a Debian specific package, so no
.orig.tar.gz or .diff was included in the upload.
I have removed this package from I
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Where should I start?
I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a
list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would
help cut down duplicate bug reports. Now, I'm forced to download a
list of *all* the bugs.
At 17:47 -0700 1998-06-12, Richard Braakman wrote:
>Package: libc6-dev
>Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[HELP] Dale Scheetz: "I have not had a chance to even read these
> reports yet. Some outside help determining what should, or
> shouldn't change would be helpful here."
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
: gd 1.3 is now DFSG free, and works around the patent issues too. I have
: uploaded a non-maintainer release of gd to main, thus, webalizer can go in
: main.
Sounds reasonable. Though, in the copyright file of webalizer, the copyright
text of GD (1.2!)
On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 11:24:21PM -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
>
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Where should I start?
>
> I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a
> list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would
> help cut down du
"James R. Van Zandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a
> list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would
> help cut down duplicate bug reports. Now, I'm forced to download a
> list of *all* the bugs.
What about h
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 04:56:20PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
>
> : gd 1.3 is now DFSG free, and works around the patent issues too. I have
> : uploaded a non-maintainer release of gd to main, thus, webalizer can go in
> : main.
>
> Sounds reaso
Please tell me what exactly you like more about mysql in comparison to
PostgreSQL which really is DFSG free.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 521
Tomislav Vujec wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 09:53:16PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Problem is, you'll never be able to convince a DOS user of a text editor
> > with different modes. Sorry, I don't think a dumb newbie should be able to
> > install a workstation, but he should be able t
Hi,
Originally I thought that it was OK that bug #19085 which I submitted
about poor performance in perl was downgraded from "important" to
"normal" severity because it only affected one application that I
wrote.
But yesterday I upgraded a bo system to hamm which has a 3000 line
/etc/passwd. Now
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "There's always one more bug"
> I got it. At least, I got one...
>
> Adam P. Harris writes:
> > I know there were a few cyrix-specific fixes introduced in 2.0.34.
> > Maybe some of the people experiencing this problem might test it out
> > with that ke
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Meskes, Michael wrote:
> Please tell me what exactly you like more about mysql in comparison to
> PostgreSQL which really is DFSG free.
I find it much faster, it uses less resources... of course it has less
features too, but you dont always need subselects and transactions.
I noticed that apt is not yet in hamm. In my opinion, this is the
currently the single most important issue for hamm: unless we have
a real good reason, we should be focussing our efforts around putting
apt into hamm.
[Yeah, it's new software -- it's also the best way to keep the hamm
upgrade fro
Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 01:48:58AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > After carefully reading over the license of Mysql it seems like it could
> > be included in the main
> > distribution area.
> >
> > I am wondering exactly what parts are preventing it from being
> > inclu
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> I noticed that apt is not yet in hamm. In my opinion, this is the
> currently the single most important issue for hamm: unless we have
> a real good reason, we should be focussing our efforts around putting
> apt into hamm.
IMHO, the single most importan
Previously Chris Fearnley wrote:
> But yesterday I upgraded a bo system to hamm which has a 3000 line
> /etc/passwd. Now adduser takes OVER ONE MINUTE to find a UID and GID
> for the new user. And my staff is complaining about the wasted time.
Are you sure it's a problem with perl? I've had the
I have a very serious problem with the latest stuff in hamm, it seems the
dynamic linker has changed behavoir, an example:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../pkglib/.libs/ ldd ./apt-get
libpkg.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpkg.so.0 (0x4000c000)
libstdc++.so.2.8 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 (0x400ce00
39 matches
Mail list logo
