On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 05:04:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Rev> It does that, but sometimes that is not always a good thing.
> Rev> Take for example the libreadline library. It is GPL, not LGPL.
> Rev> In order to link this library which is somewhat standard (IMO at
> Rev> least) your sof
On %M 0, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote
(that I had a broken mutt setup...)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Manoj Srivastava, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>
> That's a reason not to make it a binary. Even reading a config file
> would probably be too slow. Hmm. Mayb
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
> > libjpeg have different sonames.)
> How did this happen? Shouldn't we try to rectify this ASAP so that there is
> binary compatibility?
O
Steve Dunham wrote:
>
> The soname issues are with libjpeg, libgdbm, libncurses.
>
> DebianRedhat
> ==
> libjpeg.so.6a libjpeg.so.6
> libgdbm.so.1 libgdbm.so.2
> libncurses.so.3.4 libncurses.so.3.0
>
> For now, most of these i
Only if we are wrong. We should endeavor to do what the upstream
maintainer does unless it is flat wrong. We are not RH, maybe they
should make their sonames match ours. No, we should both do what is
right.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Brian,
Please, please, PLEASE, get rid of postgresql-6.3-2 from frozen.
I keep on getting bug reports, and they are fixed in slink.
There are seven binary packages involved.
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight http://w
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 11:58:57AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I have been getting bounced mail from the testing mailing list sent to Dan
> Quinlan. Can anyone verify that he has indeed left the project, or give me
> a new address for him?
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ still has a mailto [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 21253 20587
Bug#20587: There's no current libg++ package
Bug#21253: gperf can't be installed with libstdc++
Merged 20587 21253.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs
I would like to create a ftp site only for the package i want to install
on a machine (there will be a lot of machine to install so i dont want
to select every time the wanted packages).
with this i would be able to intall industrialy this distrib.
my problem is to generate the Packages, Packages.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Manoj Srivastava, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> I know that. The accepted way of using less used to be to use
> a upstream filter. Right now, it is done like so:
>__
>__>
Hi,
Oh. Well, I have a local lessopen script that takes precedence
over the /usr/bin things. I like seeing as much of the stuff as
possible (like looking at tar files one can read the README file
without having to untar and read and delete stuff later?)
I do not think my particu
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 10:29:38AM +0200, Julien Ortega wrote:
> I would like to create a ftp site only for the package i want to install
> on a machine (there will be a lot of machine to install so i dont want
> to select every time the wanted packages).
>
> with this i would be able to intall in
Oliver Elphick writes:
> Brian,
>
> Please, please, PLEASE, get rid of postgresql-6.3-2 from frozen.
>
> I keep on getting bug reports, and they are fixed in slink.
>
> There are seven binary packages involved.
Please, do install 6.3.2 into hamm since it fixed several bugs upstream as
well. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I've mentioned this on debian-pilot but I should probably also mention
it here. I'm packaging pilot-manager (http://www.moshpit.org/pilotmgr/)
for debian. It's actually packaged already and waiting on the new
pilot-link to come out...
Darren
- --
<[EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello.
A user has asked me to add maildir support for procmail. The patch:
http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~bguenter/distrib/procmail-maildir/procmail-maildir.patch
is extremely clean and simple, and since already existing .procmailrc
files do not use maildir folders (wh
What happened? Were the files simply removed? I was just downloading them to
test the new version.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuers
Previously Vaclav Hula wrote:
> During reading the bzip2 thread, because there is no bzip2
> support (at least until bzip2 is integrated in gzip),
> I added folowing in vimrc:
I added this to vim and will upload a non-maintainer package today.
Wichert.
--
==
There's one here:
ftp://ftp.lh.umu.se/pub/linux/debian-Incoming
Maybe some list of such mirrors could be added to the Developper's
Corner ?
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
deb
--On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 12:25 am + "Rev. Joseph Carter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 05:04:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Rev> It does that, but sometimes that is not always a good thing.
>> Rev> Take for example the libreadline library. It is GPL, not LGPL.
>>
Hi,
I was confused at first when I first read this message. I thought
Oliver wanted to upload his latest PosgreSQL package (6.3.2-2) only to
Slink.
In any case, I have understood everything now :-) He wants the 6.3.2-2
version that is sitting in Incoming to be installed in Hamm because
it's been
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 12:22:32PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Since ae has been converted to slang I have been having many problems with
> the keybindings for ae.
I have just done a NMU of slang1 for slink; please check if using that makes
a difference.
Greetings,
Ray
--
POPULATION EXPLOSION
bug 21164 does not seem to be a bug in the libc.
it is instead a kernel bug.
( new information can be found at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/21/21164.html
unfortunately the bug tracking system is slow, so you won't see my message
yet. basically the new message sais the following: )
i first tried
This whole thing is even stranger than that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not on the distribution list for debian-testing. In fact there are no
addresses to that domain in the list.
I have no idea why murphy is trying to send these e-mails in the first
place, much less why they are causing bounces.
On
Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
>
> > I am bemoaning the fact that lesspipe is not directly usable
> > by me anymore, since all the stuff got added to it.
>
> I'm open to suggestions on how to change it so that everybody is
> happy...
>
> What about an environment variable about what items t
Hi,
The April 11th boot disk crashes when I enter the kernel command line
option "mem=128M" (I also tried mem=32M and mem=64M -- all crashed in the
same way (see below)).
This system has 128M of RAM, but the BIOS only reports 16M to Linux.
When I try to correction this on the boot disk command-li
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 11:53:19AM -0400, Chris Fearnley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The April 11th boot disk crashes when I enter the kernel command line
> option "mem=128M" (I also tried mem=32M and mem=64M -- all crashed in the
> same way (see below)).
>
> This system has 128M of RAM, but the BIOS only r
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 12:25:56PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> What happened? Were the files simply removed? I was just downloading them to
> test the new version.
Oops. Sorry, yes, they were, hence my "WITHDRAWN" message on
debian-devel-changes.
xbase-configure was stupidly broken. More omi
> There's one here:
>
> ftp://ftp.lh.umu.se/pub/linux/debian-Incoming
>
Added.
> Maybe some list of such mirrors could be added to the Developper's
> Corner ?
>
from developers_corner.html:
There are a number of mirrors of
Debian's Incoming
directory
I am working on reorganizing the Developer
> ftp://ftp.lh.umu.se/pub/linux/debian-Incoming
>
Actually it was already on the list...
Jay Treacy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 02:22:39PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> >>On the contrary. This is an excellent point you made. ncftp
> >> is now under GPL!! Yay! libreadline not being under LGPL worked!
> >> Hurrah!
> >
> > Um, 2.x is GPL. 3.x is not, afaik.
>
> Certainly the version of 3 in hamm
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Only if we are wrong. We should endeavor to do what the upstream
> maintainer does unless it is flat wrong. We are not RH, maybe they
> should make their sonames match ours. No, we should both do what is
> right.
I definitely advocate following the upstream
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
> disagree.
>
>
> Copyright (c) 1997-1998 by Armin Biere.
>
> Author: Armin Biere.
>
> Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any
> pu
Hi, yesterday evening I read your thread about /tmp and O_CREATE.
Very nice, and I created a "libstress" pacakge, now available on:
ftp://rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl/debian/upload
It toesn't do very much (amongs others, it doesn't overload fopen(), only
open()), but I've already found a bug the man p
> "Karl" == Karl M Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Karl> Ok, I will do that when `master' is repaired.
http://master.debian.org/~karlheg/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 07:00:24PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
> > disagree.
> > Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any
> > pur
"Rev. Joseph Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 02:22:39PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > >> On the contrary. This is an excellent point you made. ncftp
> >
On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 04:27:20AM +1000, Martin Mitchell wrote:
> > 3 was yanked from hamm (hardly usable) and 2 was put in main. I think it
> > uses an epoch, which should make it install even though versionwise it's
> > older.
>
> Hm.. I'm the ncftp maintainer and the version in hamm/non-free
Scott has prepared 0.0.7 - I only have a few more things to fix up before
this will be unleashed into slink.
Everyone who was using an older version should upgrade - be sure to report
bugs :> There are still no known serious flaws..
Be sure to read the Users's Guide (/usr/doc/apt/guide.text) I d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaleh) writes:
> Only if we are wrong. We should endeavor to do what the upstream
> maintainer does unless it is flat wrong. We are not RH, maybe they
> should make their sonames match ours. No, we should both do what is
> right.
And,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 9294 general
Bug#9294: abort()
Bug reassigned from package `base/kernel' to `general'.
> reassign 10087 general
Bug#10087: Permissions and files in /dev
Bug reassigned from package `base' to `general'.
> reassign 11903 general
Bug#11903: more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> [Bugs #10087 #11903 #13017 #15267 #17647 #18416 #9294 reassigned to general].
Clarification: All these bugs are already closed, just that I don't want
to see them in my we
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Igor Grobman writes:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> igor wrote:
> >a new license yet, but here it is:
>> >
>> >/* =
>> > * Copyright (c) 1998 Moxa Technologies Corp, LTD. All rights reserved.
>>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Raul Miller writes:
>Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that a program must be either entirely GPLed,
>> or contain no GPLed parts.
>
>More precisely, the non-gpled parts must not have terms which prevent
>compliance with the gpled
Hi.
Is anyone working on wu-ftpd?
It has 41 bug reports opened, and it seems that one is quite easy to
fix (important bug #17401, #17508, #17622, #17742, #17753, and so
on...): I think that manpage ftpd.8.gz just have to be renamed into
wu-ftpd.8.gz.
I read an email of Heiko Schlittermann (packa
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Hugo Haas wrote:
:
: It has 41 bug reports opened, and it seems that one is quite easy to
: fix (important bug #17401, #17508, #17622, #17742, #17753, and so
: on...): I think that manpage ftpd.8.gz just have to be renamed into
: wu-ftpd.8.gz.
:
: I read
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Hugo Haas wrote:
> :
> : It has 41 bug reports opened, and it seems that one is quite easy to
> : fix (important bug #17401, #17508, #17622, #17742, #17753, and so
> : on...): I think that manpage ftpd.8.
I (foolishly) wrote:
> Urk! It's the Obnoxious BSD Advertising Clause, back to haunt us.
> Including the OBSDAC would make Moxa non-free.
James wrote:
> Say _what_? I do *not* think so. (Hint: look at glibc's copyright file)
And, of course he was right. Sorry to post without thinking first.
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>
> Yes, wu-ftpd is depreciated, since all it's functionality is in
> wu-ftpd-academ. The only problem is: how can I handle this?
>
> I itend to create an empty package, depending on wu-ftpd-academ. This
> empty package then may remove itself.
W
Hmm..
I don't see any version of ncftp 2 in frozen?
Someone said it was GPL (and hence free) now? And someone else said it had
gone into hamm/main, but I don't seem to have it in my packages file...
Jules
/+---+-\
| Jelibean aka
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> I don't see any version of ncftp 2 in frozen?
>
> Someone said it was GPL (and hence free) now? And someone else said it had
> gone into hamm/main, but I don't seem to have it in my packages file...
It's there. In main, I believe sec
Why is our default not mingetty. Several other dists use this. For
almost all Linux boxen this is the right choice. It is easier on mem
and cpu than agetty. Anyone who needs the other gettys also knows how
to change their getty. I have been running mingetty for a year now and
have had no probl
--On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 9:34 pm + "Rev. Joseph Carter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>> I don't see any version of ncftp 2 in frozen?
>>
>> Someone said it was GPL (and hence free) now? And someone else said it
had
>> gone into hamm/
52 matches
Mail list logo
