Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-16 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:22:22 +0100 Cyril Brulebois napsal(a): > Michal Čihař (16/11/2009): > > Hi > > Hello, > > > "Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a): > > > > > #556178 was filed against geoclue this morning, but has already > > > been marked as wontfix and closed. The suggestion was to modif

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Michal Čihař (16/11/2009): > Hi Hello, > "Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a): > > > #556178 was filed against geoclue this morning, but has already > > been marked as wontfix and closed. The suggestion was to modify > > gammu to build without libusb support on !linux, but there doesn't > > appear to

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-16 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:04:18 + "Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a): > #556178 was filed against geoclue this morning, but has already been > marked as wontfix and closed. The suggestion was to modify gammu to > build without libusb support on !linux, but there doesn't appear to be > any open re

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 15:45 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : > >> - anjuta not yet built on all arches > > > > This is a consequence of the subversion FTBFS on said architectures. It > > can be given-back once svn is fixed. > > Ok, hopefully there will be soon some progress on that issue. Ther

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-16 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:09:51 +0100 Josselin Mouette napsal(a): > > - empathy not built on kfreebsd* > > It’s waiting on geoclue, which in turn needs disabling of gammu support > on !linux. It rather looks like Gammu needs disabling libusb support on !linux, I will do that. -- Mic

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 15:45 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Josselin Mouette wrote: [...] > > Le dimanche 08 novembre 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : [...] > >> - empathy not built on kfreebsd* > > > > It’s waiting on geoclue, which in turn needs disabling of gammu support > > on !linux. > > T

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-14 Thread Luk Claes
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Hi, and thanks for this much needed inventory. Most of the issues here > were fixed this week. > > Maybe it’s time for a new review? Note that it was only a list of the most obvious blockers. Things I did not look at yet for the gnome transition are RC bugs for instance.

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, and thanks for this much needed inventory. Most of the issues here were fixed this week. Maybe it’s time for a new review? Le dimanche 08 novembre 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : > - gdl not built on hppa which prevents gnome-python-extras from migrating Now built. > - webkit not b

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is > ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an > issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled: > > * xulrunner: Sorry, I dela

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-10 Thread Luk Claes
Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Hi >> >> Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is >> ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an >> issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled: >> >> *

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is > ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an > issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled: > > * xulrunner: > - iceweasel

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-09 Thread Michal Čihař
Dne Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:22:14 +0100 Michael Banck napsal(a): > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:32:43PM +0100, Michal ??iha?? wrote: > > Hi > > > > Dne Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:48:11 +0100 > > Luk Claes napsal(a): > > > > > - geeqie not yet built on all arches which prevents libchamplain and > > > empathy

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:32:43PM +0100, Michal ??iha?? wrote: > Hi > > Dne Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:48:11 +0100 > Luk Claes napsal(a): > > > - geeqie not yet built on all arches which prevents libchamplain and > > empathy from migrating > > Filed upstream bug about FTBFS on hurd hurd-i386 is not

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hello, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is > ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an > issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled: [...] > - gnome-main-menu should use libslab otherwise it preven

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:48:11 +0100 Luk Claes napsal(a): > - geeqie not yet built on all arches which prevents libchamplain and > empathy from migrating Filed upstream bug about FTBFS on hurd and I will try to look at it deeper tomorrow, but new upload is anyway already waiting in NEW, so it

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > * gupnp > - libnice not yet rebuilt/reuploaded libnice was binNMUed as part of this transition so shouldn't be a blocker. The remaining issue that I can currently see here is gupnp-igd being out-of-date on mips. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 08, Luk Claes wrote: > - seed couples transition to gupnp and poppler transition (via > gir-repository) > - evince couples transition to poppler transition seed due to gobject-introspection blocks udev, whose next release will cause/require a concurrent upgrade of consolekit. -- ciao, Ma

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Petr Salinger
The webkit #554718 currently on kfreebsd-amd64 blocks building of seed, yelp, gir-repository, gstreamer0.10 (via gir-repository), devhelp, kazehakase, ... For details see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/11/msg00289.html Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debi

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Luk Claes
Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:53:18PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is >>> ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:53:18PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > Hi > > > > Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is > > ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an > > issue or that

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is > ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an > issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled: > > * xulrunner: > - iceweasel

xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

2009-11-08 Thread Luk Claes
Hi Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled: * xulrunner: - iceweasel crashes (#552178)? - freej FTBFS on amd64 (no bug filed yet) - gdl not buil