Re: stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-02-01 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 01:50:53PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package > > uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the hit count for > > people maintining multiple binary pa

Re: stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-02-01 Thread Rob Browning
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package > uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the hit count for > people maintining multiple binary packages. Well, I might have made it on the list if you weighted by compi

Re: stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-01-31 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > I actually did the other way first, it wasn't siginificantly different > except Brandon Robinson was in 3rd place (X). Spell m' damn name right, boy!!! -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If enc

Re: stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-01-30 Thread Joey Hess
David Welton wrote: > Well, often times, those packages are more complex than single binary > packages. No way is epic as difficult to maintain as X, yet, if I'm > not mistaken, they each have just one source package. > > It would be neat to do both stats, and then compare. I actually did the o

Re: stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-01-29 Thread David Welton
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 03:44:25PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source > package uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the > hit count for people maintining multiple binary packages. Well, often times, those packages are more

stupid stats (was Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master)

1999-01-29 Thread Joey Hess
Vincent Renardias wrote: > Since you seem to be in this kind of statistics, you may want to try to > find out which developers are the most productive (ie: have done the > highest number of uploads) ;) Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package uploads, not binary pac

Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master

1999-01-29 Thread Richard Braakman
Joey Hess wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > xfree86 (3.3.2.3a-9) frozen unstable; urgency=medium > > . > > ./xbase/changelog 3.3.2-4: 143 > ... (other binary packages with same 143 line changelog and same source) > ./lintian/changelog 0.3.0: 139 I Will Try Harder. :-) Richard Braakman

Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master

1999-01-29 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: > (changelog-length-parser is atached) Well it is now anyway. -- see shy jo #!/usr/bin/perl # Feed this program a list of debian changelogs. It will parse each, looking # at the entries, and emit a running count of how long each individual # changelog entry is. This was written

Re: xfree86_3.3.2.3a-9 (source i386 all) uploaded to master

1999-01-29 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: > xfree86 (3.3.2.3a-9) frozen unstable; urgency=medium > . Wow! I wondered if this is the biggest debian changelog ever. It is, here are the other contenders: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/debian3/lintian/laboratory/binary>find -name changelog | \ xargs perl ~/changelog-le