> "Ben" == Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:45 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
>>
>> 1) If there is another good offline (i.e. shell command) html
>> validator in Debian? weblint-perl for (non)-example does not
>> support xhtml.
Ben>
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:45 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> I noticed that wdg-html-validator had been orphaned for more than a
> year, and since I use the offline validator script, I filed an ITA
> (http://bugs.debian.org/390833). Now that I look at the logistics of
> packaging it (down
On a related note:
Why isn't the W3C Log Validator available as a package?
It's the w3c's all-in-one tool with batch validation, link checking,
and it analyzes your server logs to prioritize fixes. Basically, it's
fantastic.
http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/LogValidator/
Daniel Brumbaugh Keeney
--
To
dator versus w3c-html-validator? The packages have
about the same popcon counts.
I did not checked w3c-html-validator but my impression is that
wdg-html-validator does a *really* good job and I would really
miss the offline version.
If the answer to 1=yes, 2=no, probably I will re-orphan. If 1=no,
pport
xhtml.
2) Are there any compelling advantages to the cgi validator provided
by wdg-html-validator versus w3c-html-validator? The packages have
about the same popcon counts.
If the answer to 1=yes, 2=no, probably I will re-orphan. If 1=no,
2=no, I might consider repackaging just the of
5 matches
Mail list logo
