Hello,
Can somebody here please check out my response to the claim ""ld"
prefers linking with the oldest [library version]."
I suspect upgrading the major version to major * 1000 may have only
worked due to unrelated reasons.
Thanks
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
On 10/05/12 01:04, Brian May wrote:
> Should I be changing
> the library name from libdar64-5 to libdar64-5000? Or does this change
> reflect some sort of misunderstanding in how library versions work?
Given that he doesn't understand "why libtool sets the first digit to
current-age (5000 instead
Hello,
The upstream author for one of my packages changed the major version
of the shared library (only used by the package) from 5 to 5000.
I am trying to understand his response as to why. Should I be changing
the library name from libdar64-5 to libdar64-5000? Or does this change
reflect some s
3 matches
Mail list logo
