Hello,
I cannot access this website using ELinks (which uses GNUTLS in Debian),
unless I compile ELinks to use OpenSSL instead of GNUTLS. Can't this be fixed
?
The error that I get from elinks provided by Debian is:
Unable to retrieve https://tracker.debian.org/mlterm:
Resource temporarily
Hi,
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> >> This would then give this for dpkg:
> >>
> >> List-Id:
> >>
> >> I can add this if it's actually useful. Anyone seconding Simon's request?
>
> on behalf of all gmail users, yes please.
Done.
I did not add the keyword in the identifier b
On Dec 9, 2015 8:44 AM, "Raphael Hertzog" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have
> > better user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers.
> > Just an idea.
>
> And we would use package name + se
On 9 December 2015 at 13:58, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog , 2015-12-09, 14:43:
>>>
>>> How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have better
>>> user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers. Just an idea.
>>
>>
>> And we would use package name + servic
* Raphael Hertzog , 2015-12-09, 14:43:
How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have
better user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers.
Just an idea.
And we would use package name + service name as identifier?
This would then give this for dpkg:
List-
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> List-Id:
Hmm, I would have thought to include keywords also:
List-Id:
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have
> better user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers.
> Just an idea.
And we would use package name + service name as identifier?
This would then give this for dpkg:
Hi,
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I was just wondering: would it be now possible to use
> @packages.debian.org as contact address (Maintainer field) for a
> Debian package, or is it still impossible because of forward loops ?
Right now, it's still not a good idea but it should not
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> For package subscribers
> ---
>
> In theory, as a package subscriber you have nothing to do, in practice,
> depending on your mail filtering rules, you might have to adjust them.
> Each forwarded mail now has headers like this:
>
> X-Loop: dispa..
Le Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:18:21PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> we're getting one step further in the deprecation of
> packages.qa.debian.org in favor of the new tracker.debian.org. We have
> just migrated all mail subscriptions from the old PTS to the new package
> tracker. This does impa
10 matches
Mail list logo
