> I haven't looked for it, but there's probably a bug somewhere for this
> already.
I could not find any opened bugs, so I created one against the tracker
virtual package:
https://bugs.debian.org/1043546
Cheers,
--
Samuel Henrique
Hello,
> There are more inconsistencies, but you get the point. I'm pretty
> sure everything will go back to normal given enough time, but it
> looks like the particular set of circumstances around the libvirt
> package have fallen through the cracks of tracker.d.o's logic and it
> could be intere
Hi,
if you look at the tracker.d.o page for libvirt[1] you'll see that it
displays inconsistent information.
Specifically, the "news" sections mentions the recent (2023-08-08)
upload of 9.6.0-1[2], but the "action needed" section still claims
that a new upstream version is available; the vcswatch
3 matches
Mail list logo