Does it seem ironic to others that documents titled "Request for
Comments" can't be quoted while making comments on them?
(This is a flame of the current IETF, which has goals contrary to the
people who originally designed the Internet.)
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:48:27PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:03:22PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > > Answer 1: Nobody asked the right to change the content of the file
> > > RFC234
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:03:22PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > Answer 1: Nobody asked the right to change the content of the file
> > RFC23423.txt and distribute it as is. This would clearly be wrong and
> >
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Answer 1: Nobody asked the right to change the content of the file
> RFC23423.txt and distribute it as is. This would clearly be wrong and
> it would be ok to ask for a file rename, for a clear notice changes
Ok, people. Even if I'm not native speaker, I'll now try to sum up the
flamewar we just had about the RFC licencing. Don't get me wrong here. In
fact I personnaly have no fixed opinion about this. I just want to be able
to fix the tons of RC bugs involved by this issue, close them, get other
bugs d
5 matches
Mail list logo
