Re: telnet98_98.02.16.orig.tar.gz is wrong

1999-05-21 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 07:41:20PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > >I don't know which (pseudo-)package I should submit to, so I post it > >to this list. > > I e-mailed this to a couple of people but got no response. > > I am no longer the maintainer of this package, but no-one has yet taken > it over

Re: telnet98_98.02.16.orig.tar.gz is wrong

1999-05-21 Thread Ian Lynagh
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >I don't know which (pseudo-)package I should submit to, so I post it >to this list. I e-mailed this to a couple of people but got no response. I am no longer the maintainer of this package, but no-one has yet taken it ove

telnet98_98.02.16.orig.tar.gz is wrong

1999-05-19 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
Hi, I don't know which (pseudo-)package I should submit to, so I post it to this list. It seems telnet98_98.02.16.orig.tar.gz in non-us.debian.org:/debian-non-US/dists/potato/main/source differs from that of telnet98_98.02.16-3.dsc. Altough telnet98_98.02.16-3.dsc says dcf4de07acc43f3753f4e8e