[Russell Coker]
> Why not have software which wants to have the dependencies of a
> package look at the dependencies line as well as the
> build-dependencies?
>
> It seems to me that the package maintainers are already providing the
> necessary information and the people who maintain autobuilder
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, peter green wrote:
> Some packages have runtime dependencies on packages that they do not
> have corresponding build-dependencies for. This leads to the building of
> uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing
> transition of packages.
>
> Currently t
* peter green , 2011-11-29, 19:23:
Some packages have runtime dependencies on packages that they do not
have corresponding build-dependencies for. This leads to the building
of uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with
testing transition of packages.
Currently there are two
peter green wrote:
[...]
> This leads to the building of
> uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing
> transition of packages.
>
> Currently there are two workarounds for this situation
>
> 1: manually alter the package's architecture list to limit building to those
> arc
Some packages have runtime dependencies on packages that they do not
have corresponding build-dependencies for. This leads to the building of
uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing
transition of packages.
Currently there are two workarounds for this situation
1: m
5 matches
Mail list logo
