sending debian-private postings to slashdot

2006-05-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 19:18 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit : > However, it has come to my attention that at least one developer > appears to be reading debian-private at their gmail account. And at least hundreds of people appear to be reading debian-private on slashdo

ITP: slash -- Slashdot Like Automated Storytelling Homepage

2002-01-14 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
Package: wnpp Version: N/A Severity: wishlist Description: The code that runs Slashdot Slash -- Slashdot Like Automated Storytelling Homepage -- is an architecture to put together web sites. It comes with functionality for posting articles, conducting polls, having discu ssions, and can be

Re: slashdot

1998-10-10 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> I've essentially come to the opinion that the GPL has no control over > dynamic linking b/c it's something a user does in the privacy of his own > home. Besides, what if I create a binary that links to a non-existant library. I build the ELF structures by hand (?). Could you distribute a binary

Re: Slashdot on the KDE stance

1998-10-10 Thread Joseph Carter
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 11:40:04AM -0700, David Welton wrote: > > > Slashdot has posted an article about the decision to remove the KDE > > > binaries > > > right now. > > > > Could someone please post the article or at least the complete URL? > > ht

Re: Slashdot on the KDE stance

1998-10-09 Thread Curt Daugaard
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 09:27:48PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 11:40:04AM -0700, David Welton wrote: > > http://slashdot.org - it's a pretty good source of Linux news. The > > comments have degraded though, don't bother with them.. Used to be > > people like Alan Cox oc

Re: slashdot

1998-10-09 Thread Stephen J. Carpenter
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 03:09:05PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian Private <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Friday, October 09, 1998 11:49 AM > Subject: Re: slashdot > > > &g

Re: Slashdot on the KDE stance

1998-10-09 Thread Michael Meskes
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 11:40:04AM -0700, David Welton wrote: > http://slashdot.org - it's a pretty good source of Linux news. The > comments have degraded though, don't bother with them.. Used to be > people like Alan Cox occasionally posted.. no more (afaik). Yes, I know that. I was hoping for

Re: slashdot

1998-10-09 Thread Shaya Potter
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Private <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, October 09, 1998 11:49 AM Subject: Re: slashdot >John Lapeyre writes: >> Something that came up in the discussion. Does anyone have any idea what >

Re: Slashdot on the KDE stance

1998-10-09 Thread David Welton
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 01:39:09PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 10:53:23PM +0200, Francesco Tapparo wrote: > > Slashdot has posted an article about the decision to remove the KDE binaries > > right now. > > Could someone please post the article or

Re: Slashdot on the KDE stance

1998-10-09 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 10:53:23PM +0200, Francesco Tapparo wrote: > Slashdot has posted an article about the decision to remove the KDE binaries > right now. Could someone please post the article or at least the complete URL? Michael -- Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D

Slashdot on the KDE stance

1998-10-08 Thread Francesco Tapparo
Slashdot has posted an article about the decision to remove the KDE binaries right now. Francesco