Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-17 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:54:15 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > if sphinx-intl is primary application (cli tool, etc.), than binary pkg > > > sphinx-intl is better. If it's library/module, than python3-sphinx-intl > > > is better. > > > > Based on the description of the project [1], it looks lik

Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:26:34PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 13/09/17 12:21, Ondrej Novy wrote: > > if sphinx-intl is primary application (cli tool, etc.), than binary pkg > > sphinx-intl is better. If it's library/module, than python3-sphinx-intl > > is better. > > Based on the descrip

Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-13 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 13/09/17 12:21, Ondrej Novy wrote: if sphinx-intl is primary application (cli tool, etc.), than binary pkg sphinx-intl is better. If it's library/module, than python3-sphinx-intl is better. Based on the description of the project [1], it looks like it is the former. [1] https://pypi.python

Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-13 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, 2017-09-13 13:18 GMT+02:00 Hideki Yamane : > Then, source package as sphinx-intl and binary package python3-sphinx-intl > is fine? > if sphinx-intl is primary application (cli tool, etc.), than binary pkg sphinx-intl is better. If it's library/module, than python3-sphinx-intl is better. --

Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-13 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:49:25 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > The python3- prefix is for binary packages only (alongside python- and > pypy-). > > Should you decide to use a prefix for the source package name, it should > be python-, not python3-. Since sphinx-intl is intended to be used as a

Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-12 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 12/09/17 14:07, Hideki Yamane wrote: On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:48:17 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Please consider changing the source package name to sphinx-intl. Based on the description of the source package, it will produce a stand-alone utility not a Python library. Thanks for your co

Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-12 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:48:17 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Please consider changing the source package name to sphinx-intl. Based > on the description of the source package, it will produce a stand-alone > utility not a Python library. Thanks for your comment, I've chosen it since sphinx as

s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl

2017-09-11 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Please consider changing the source package name to sphinx-intl. Based on the description of the source package, it will produce a stand-alone utility not a Python library. Cheers, Ghis