Re: SysV already works! Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-23 Thread Mark Symonds
Hello, 'OdyX' (please use your real name?): On Feb 23, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Le samedi, 22 février 2014, 21.58:15 Mark Symonds a écrit : >> Please stop. >> >> We can't win with all this fighting… I suspect there is SABOTAGE >> happening within the Deb

Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-23 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Consider using _rspamd instead to make any conflicts with local users less > likely. (You will need to use the --force-badname option to adduser.) I'll go this route: more aesthetically pleasing compared to Debian- prefix. Also, ps. I'm st

Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-22 Thread Mark Symonds
Hello, On Feb 22, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Iain R. Learmonth" writes: >> On 23/02/14 01:28, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > >>> You can find the recent thread here if you'd like to read it: > >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00187.html > >> Ignore me there. I

SysV already works! Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-22 Thread Mark Symonds
Please stop. We can't win with all this fighting… I suspect there is SABOTAGE happening within the Debian project, we never thought it possible but that doesn't change anything we've seen. A fork might be easier? Multiple forks? (while they waste their time) On Feb 22

Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-22 Thread Russ Allbery
"Iain R. Learmonth" writes: > On 23/02/14 01:28, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: >> You can find the recent thread here if you'd like to read it: >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00187.html > Ignore me there. It seems that at the end of the thread it did settle on > prefixing with _

Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-22 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
On 23/02/14 01:28, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > You can find the recent thread here if you'd like to read it: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00187.html > > Iain. > Ignore me there. It seems that at the end of the thread it did settle on prefixing with _ for the reason Russ h

Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-22 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
On 23/02/14 01:01, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > I'd like to check with you that it is ok to create > dynamically-allocated system user and group `rspamd' for package > `rspamd' (bug #683746). > Consensus on this recently seemed to be that there's no real way of preventing users from creating collisio

Re: rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Mikhail Gusarov writes: > I'd like to check with you that it is ok to create dynamically-allocated > system user and group `rspamd' for package `rspamd' (bug #683746). Consider using _rspamd instead to make any conflicts with local users less likely. (You will need to use the --force-badname op

rspamd user/group for rspamd package

2014-02-22 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Hi. I'd like to check with you that it is ok to create dynamically-allocated system user and group `rspamd' for package `rspamd' (bug #683746). Best regards, Mikhail Gusarov. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis