Re: rmadison vs. dak ls

2013-07-24 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 2013-07-24 08:51, schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: [..] Just out of curiosity: Does that also mean, that a user running 'apt-get source ' may not receive the package version shipped in testing, but one used by an other package? If there is both a source and binary named or requests source fo

Re: rmadison vs. dak ls

2013-07-23 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl writes: > * Ansgar Burchardt [130723 11:11]: >> Please also not that the additional source packages included can be at a >> *higher* version than sources included in src_association. This is what >> happened here: grub2_1.99-27+deb7u1 is in jessie, however a package >> e

Re: rmadison vs. dak ls (was: Re: Grub 2.00 in testing?)

2013-07-23 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Ansgar Burchardt [130723 11:11]: [..] > Please also not that the additional source packages included can be at a > *higher* version than sources included in src_association. This is what > happened here: grub2_1.99-27+deb7u1 is in jessie, however a package > embedding a newer version of gru

rmadison vs. dak ls (was: Re: Grub 2.00 in testing?)

2013-07-23 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 07/23/2013 09:03, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> I've just noticed that #699268 is supposed to be fixed, but last I heard >> about somebody from QA, that was during the last stages of the wheezy >> release cycle, and while the issue was known back