Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:18:21PM -0800, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo wrote: > -[0-7][lmh] specify drive and density > > I'm not sure exactly what that's for, but it does rule out -2. It kinda sucks > when you completely run out of single character options. %-) That's for specifying a tape drive an

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 06:08:23PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > > > > sounds very good. > > besides that -j ("junkzip"?) is NON-DESCRIPTIVE at all. -Z or -2 would be > better... but thats an Upstream Issue I guess. -Z is for piping through comp

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 06:08:23PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > sounds very good. besides that -j ("junkzip"?) is NON-DESCRIPTIVE at all. -Z or -2 would be better... but thats an Upstream Issue I guess. Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.d

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 03:09:34PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > I'm satisfied with this solution, and will work with Paul to deliver an > implementation for Debian as soon as possible. sounds very good. -- Mike Stone

Re: resolution of the tar -I issue

On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Bdale Garbee wrote: > I'm satisfied with this solution, and will work with Paul to deliver an > implementation for Debian as soon as possible. > > [snip] I'm happy with this solution. BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K-

resolution of the tar -I issue

I'm satisfied with this solution, and will work with Paul to deliver an implementation for Debian as soon as possible. Bdale --- Forwarded Message Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:49:43 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL