Re: request for clarification wrt POSIX /bin/sh and local

Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could you have a policy of releasing more often? I'd personally be happy to, but don't have a lot of time right now to drive the process personally. I'm also recovering from a pretty nasty bug that took out my weekend. :/ -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL P

Re: request for clarification wrt POSIX /bin/sh and local

Hi, On Sun, 13 May 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > this hasn't been discussed in a while, and i'm wondering if we could > > come to an agreement to clarify policy on the matter. > > We already did and have even agreed on language, and it's just waiting f

Re: request for clarification wrt POSIX /bin/sh and local

sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this hasn't been discussed in a while, and i'm wondering if we could > come to an agreement to clarify policy on the matter. We already did and have even agreed on language, and it's just waiting for the next policy upload (and me to merge the language ch

request for clarification wrt POSIX /bin/sh and local

hi -devel and -policy, this hasn't been discussed in a while, and i'm wondering if we could come to an agreement to clarify policy on the matter. currently, policy states: currently, policy (10.4) states: ...The standard shell interpreter /bin/sh can be a symbolic link to any