Re: removing perl-base

1999-09-24 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Russell Coker, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: >It's been a while since the versioned Perl was introduced into potato, so I >tried removing the fake package perl-base. >Should I report bugs against bug, dpkg-perl, data-dumper, and tetex-base? Or >i

Re: removing perl-base

1999-09-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 09:36:06AM +0200, Russell Coker écrivait: > It's been a while since the versioned Perl was introduced into potato, so I > tried removing the fake package perl-base. > Should I report bugs against bug, dpkg-perl, data-dumper, and tetex-base? Or > is it OK to depend on perl-b

removing perl-base

1999-09-24 Thread Russell Coker
It's been a while since the versioned Perl was introduced into potato, so I tried removing the fake package perl-base. Should I report bugs against bug, dpkg-perl, data-dumper, and tetex-base? Or is it OK to depend on perl-base? **_ Req base perl-baseFake package assuring that one of the