Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Bjørn Mork (2014-01-15 14:10:35) > Ansgar Burchardt writes: > > Bjørn Mork writes: > > > >> Care to provide a pointer to an example? > > > > RFC 5230, sections 4.2, 4.5, 4.6 and 8. > > Thanks for the pointer. Are there any implementations of RFC 5230 in > Debian? > > Both "apt-cache se

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-15 Thread Bjørn Mork
Ansgar Burchardt writes: > Bjørn Mork writes: > >> Care to provide a pointer to an example? > > RFC 5230, sections 4.2, 4.5, 4.6 and 8. Thanks for the pointer. Are there any implementations of RFC 5230 in Debian? Both "apt-cache search 5230" and "apt-cache search sieve vacation" only return li

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/14/2014 01:58 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org): > >> With mailbot from courier-maildrop, it's easy to do for a .mailfilter >> file (though it'd be once per recipient, which is IMO enough, I don't > > You have an interesting definition of "easy", Thomas

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-13 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org): > With mailbot from courier-maildrop, it's easy to do for a .mailfilter > file (though it'd be once per recipient, which is IMO enough, I don't You have an interesting definition of "easy", Thomas..:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 13, Ian Jackson wrote: > OK. I will take it. Would you prefer me to do an upload right away > to change the Maintainer or can it wait (weeks very likely) until I've > had a chance to do some actual work on it ? No hurry. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Marco d'Itri writes ("Re: removal of the vacation package"): > On Jan 12, Ian Jackson wrote: > > The set of bugs looks tractable to me. Do you have a half-prepared > > upload somewhere or is the versionn in the archive the most recent ? > > No, I have really

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/13/2014 05:25 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote: > m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: >> On Jan 12, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> >>> It still seems to have a fair number of loyal users though. I see your >> popcon says 1867 have it installed, but only 222 "voted". >> >>> If we do have such a >>> replac

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Bjørn Mork writes: > Ansgar Burchardt writes: >> Bjørn Mork writes: >>> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice >>> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week >>> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in >>>

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-13 Thread Bjørn Mork
Ansgar Burchardt writes: > Bjørn Mork writes: >> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice >> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week >> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in >> sieve isn't likely to happ

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Bjørn Mork writes: > Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice > defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week > to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in > sieve isn't likely to happen. > > The world has become a l

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Bjørn Mork writes: > This doesn't look like a MIME bug to me. It looks like vacation > truncates multiline subjects. There is absolutely no reason it should > try to parse any MIME. Well, if you include the subject in the reply, it would nice if it would undo RFC 2047 encoding and then declare

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-12 Thread Bjørn Mork
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jan 12, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> It still seems to have a fair number of loyal users though. I see your > popcon says 1867 have it installed, but only 222 "voted". > >> If we do have such a >> replacement (I just don't know) please mention it in the

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 12, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > It still seems to have a fair number of loyal users though. I see your popcon says 1867 have it installed, but only 222 "voted". > If we do have such a > replacement (I just don't know) please mention it in the removal bug > report. I agree with waldi that

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:00:45AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > but I wonder if we do have a decent replacement for it to > suggest to our users. Dovecot LDA supports Sieve and die vacation extension. Not sure if we have other stand-alone replacements. Bastian -- Emotions are ali

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Marco d'Itri writes ("removal of the vacation package"): > I stopped maintaining it years ago and nobody ever bothered to ask me > about it... > It does not support MIME and a lot of other things that are required to > be a good citizen in today's Internet, so un

Re: removal of the vacation package

2014-01-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 03:22:59AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > It does not support MIME and a lot of other things that are required to > be a good citizen in today's Internet, so unless somebody has some > really compelling arguments to keep it around and wants to adopt it > I will request remo

removal of the vacation package

2014-01-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
I stopped maintaining it years ago and nobody ever bothered to ask me about it... It does not support MIME and a lot of other things that are required to be a good citizen in today's Internet, so unless somebody has some really compelling arguments to keep it around and wants to adopt it I will