Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Branden, On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:08, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hi Hugh, > > [...] > So whether the man page is hand-crafted or generated from some other > format at build time is not relevant. In fact, it's _meta_ irrelevant > (if that's even a thing) because the only reason (apart from

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 09:10, Colin Watson wrote: > > Your problem is that you need this line as the very first line of the > page to instruct man(1) to run the tbl preprocessor: > > '\" t > > See https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/man-db/man.1.en.html#DEFAULTS That does the trick. Thank you!

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2023-08-17T01:37:52+0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:08:18PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > [6] https://man.cx/grog > > > > I was going to link to > > https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/groff/grof.1.en.html here, but > > the man page is missing! groff

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:08:18PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > [6] https://man.cx/grog > > I was going to link to > https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/groff/grof.1.en.html here, but > the man page is missing! groff definitely ships it. Any advice? Aside from the typo in th

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Hugh, At 2023-08-17T07:54:03+1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 03:39, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > > This all seems promising. Unfortunately, the man page is > > > hand-crafted, not generated from another source, so

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:54:03AM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > The man page in question -- ftlint.1 -- is in the freetype2-demos > package [1], or you can get an online copy from [2]. > > [1] /usr/share/man/man1/ftlint.1.gz > [2] > https://sources.debian.org/src/freetype/2.13.0%2Bdfsg-1/ft2demo

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 03:39, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > This all seems promising. Unfortunately, the man page is hand-crafted, > > not generated from another source, so groff is never invoked, and no > > other documents are referenced

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > This all seems promising. Unfortunately, the man page is hand-crafted, > not generated from another source, so groff is never invoked, and no > other documents are referenced in the file. groff must be run somewhere, because you're s

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
ot run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE > > macro called with TW register undefined) > > > > It seems TW is not defined in the number register. > > > > While I can define TW by adding `.nr TW 0` before .TS, I don't know if > > that's the correct soluti

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
f-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor > > failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE > > macro called with TW register undefined) > > I haven't looked at your code in detail, but this sounds similar to > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-15 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Hugh, I work on groff upstream. At 2023-08-15T22:46:30+1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor > failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE > macro called with TW register undefined) > > It seems TW is not

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-15 Thread Colin Watson
ot run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE > macro called with TW register undefined) I haven't looked at your code in detail, but this sounds similar to https://bugs.debian.org/1042358. groff is most likely observing that you're using the tbl macros but haven't invoked groff with -t, w

groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-15 Thread Hugh McMaster
Lintian has recently started emitting this groff warning for ftlint.1 in freetype-demos as part of its man pages check: groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE macro called with TW register undefined) It seems TW

Bug#1041417: ITP: rust-regalloc2 -- backtracking register allocator

2023-07-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
/bytecodealliance/regalloc2 * License : Apache-2.0 with LLVM exception Programming Lang: Rust Description : backtracking register allocator regalloc2 is a register allocator that started life as, and is about 50% still, a port of IonMonkey's backtracking register allocator to Rust. In

Bug#1026127: ITP: python-comm -- Register a comm implementation in the Jupyter kernel

2022-12-15 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Description : Register a comm implementation in the Jupyter kernel It provides a way to register a Kernel Comm implementation, as per the Jupyter kernel protocol. It also provides a base Comm implementation and a default CommManager that can be used. This is a new dependency of the ipykernel

Bug#876767: ITP: libcrypt-u2f-server-perl -- Crypt::U2F::Server::Simple - Register and Authenticate U2F compatible security devices

2017-09-25 Thread Xavier Guimard
: BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Perl Description : Crypt::U2F::Server::Simple - Register and Authenticate U2F compatible security devices Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) is an open authentication standard that strengthens and simplifies two-factor authentication using specialized USB

Bug#851958: ITP: r-cran-worrms -- GNU R client of World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS)

2017-01-20 Thread Andreas Tille
client of World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Client for World Register of Marine Species (<http://www.marinespecies.org/>). Includes functions for each of the API methods, including searching for names by name, date and common names, searching using external identifiers, fetching synony

This is Your Very Last Chance to Register for Clinical Trials Summit 2015!

2015-09-15 Thread Sarah Malone
Dear Colleague, The 9th Annual Optimizing Clinical Trials Summit: Site Selection, Feasibility & Patient Recruitment (6th – 8th October, London) is almost fully booked, with only 8 seats left. If you have not already reserved a seat, its time to book now if you would like to join. Request

Bug#794816: ITP: python-click-plugins -- Click extension to register external CLI commands (Python 2)

2015-08-06 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
* License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Click extension to register external CLI commands Click plugins allows developers of Click commandline applications to add a plugin mechanism to their tools. This allows the creation of subcommands registered by those plugins

Bug#747601: ITP: lxqt-globalkeys -- Daemon used to register global keyboard shortcuts

2014-05-10 Thread 李健秋
on used to register global keyboard shortcuts (long description would come later.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2014051010180

Joanna Lumley to open Campaign to Win Conference, London 7th Nov 2013 - Register Now

2013-07-24 Thread Campaign to WIn
Do you have a key role or an interest in campaigning? Ever wondered why some campaigns 'fizz' and others 'fizzle'? Want to get unique insights in how to 'Win'? Come to the Campaign2Win Conference Come and interact with professionals that have in three recent successful campaigns, turned arou

Re: "register" files in dpkg database programmatically? (was Re: How Debian Deals with Data)

2011-07-18 Thread Christopher Baines
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 14:19 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > - Treat the file as though it were shipped in the package directly. > > This means it is removed on package upgrade, as well as on package > > removal. This is very straightforwar

Re: "register" files in dpkg database programmatically? (was Re: How Debian Deals with Data)

2011-07-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > - Treat the file as though it were shipped in the package directly. >  This means it is removed on package upgrade, as well as on package >  removal.  This is very straightforward (append the filename to >  /var/lib/dpkg/info/{foo}.list), b

Re: "register" files in dpkg database programmatically?

2011-07-16 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Peter Samuelson | - Treat the file as though it were shipped in the package directly. | This means it is removed on package upgrade, as well as on package | removal. This is very straightforward (append the filename to | /var/lib/dpkg/info/{foo}.list), but perhaps not too useful. This

Re: "register" files in dpkg database programmatically? (was Re: How Debian Deals with Data)

2011-07-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Roger Leigh] > By registering the file as I create it, I completely avoid the > breakage potential of complex and poorly-tested postrm logic--it's > completely removed. It also means that other packages can't > arbitrarily overwrite it. It would certainly be very useful for > e.g. generated fil

Re: "register" files in dpkg database programmatically? (was Re: How Debian Deals with Data)

2011-07-16 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 08:32:46PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 17:12 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > > > It would be useful in any number of situations to be able > > > to "

Re: "register" files in dpkg database programmatically? (was Re: How Debian Deals with Data)

2011-07-16 Thread Christopher Baines
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 17:12 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > It would be useful in any number of situations to be able > > to "register" a file with dpkg: tell dpkg that a given package owns a > > given

Re: "register" files in dpkg database programmatically? (was Re: How Debian Deals with Data)

2011-07-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > It would be useful in any number of situations to be able > to "register" a file with dpkg: tell dpkg that a given package owns a > given file, so that it is automatically removed when the package is > removed or upg

"register" files in dpkg database programmatically? (was Re: How Debian Deals with Data)

2011-07-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
d be useful in any number of situations to be able to "register" a file with dpkg: tell dpkg that a given package owns a given file, so that it is automatically removed when the package is removed or upgraded. I can see this being used in many postinst scripts, so as to simplify or eli

Bug#630870: ITP: libcgi-application-plugin-autorunmode-perl -- CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes

2011-06-18 Thread Nicholas Bamber
/dist/CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/ * License : Perl Programming Lang: Perl Description : CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes This package is being split out from its current bundle package. The CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode plugin for CGI::Application

Bug#535619: ITP: python-keybinder -- register global key bindings for gtk-based apps

2009-07-03 Thread Luca Falavigna
Pölsterl Alex Graveley * URL : http://kaizer.se/wiki/python-keybinder/ * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: C Description : register global key bindings for gtk-based apps Python extension to allow applications to register a key binding to be later

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/10/08 at 13:50 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 21, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on > > update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs > > faster than I file them anyway ;) > WTF? Packa

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 21, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on > update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs > faster than I file them anyway ;) WTF? Packages other than inetd daemons MUST NOT depend on update-inetd

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-23 Thread Raphael Geissert
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> >> If everything goes the way I want it to be, it won't be just lucas the one >> filing reports: I asked lucas if he could do the remove/purge test in lenny > > I'll do that. Thanks :) > >> and >> the full install/

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote: > >> Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit : > >> > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale) > >> >

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit : >> > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale) >> > does not count in the great cookie contest? >> >> Of course it

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-21 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:50:59AM -0500]: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Does bribing lucas into not using grid5k anymore works too ? :) > > Definitely! Please add it to the rules :) Can Lucas be bribed with cookies? I always noticed

Depending on update-inetd [was: Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies]

2008-10-21 Thread James Westby
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:39 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on > update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs > faster than I file them anyway ;) You mean like this one? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/10/08 at 14:11 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit : > > > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale) > > > does not count in the great cookie

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-21 Thread Chris Lamb
Josselin Mouette wrote: > we are currently very close to release lenny which is most likely going > to be absolutely awesome. > > However, there are currently around 100 RC bugs remaining Apologies if this has already been brought up. Using the number RC bugs that a present in lenny and sid is

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-21 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Does bribing lucas into not using grid5k anymore works too ? :) Definitely! Please add it to the rules :) -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-21 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit : > > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale) > > does not count in the great cookie contest? > > Of course it does count; added to the rules

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit : > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale) > does not count in the great cookie contest? Of course it does count; added to the rules in the wiki page. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your pr

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-21 Thread David Bremner
At Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:43:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote > Fixing a RC bug means either of: > * Uploading a NMU that fixes the bug to unstable. > * Convincing, with a mail that details the rationale, a release > manager to tag the bug lenny-ignore. > * Convincing, in

Re: where to register TeX related software with doc-base?

2008-03-25 Thread Frank Kuester
have a section "tex", at least I > > used to register the docs of some my TeX-related packages there > > Has this section been removed on purpose? If yes, where should > > TeX-related documenation go now? > > Good question; with the currently declared hierarchy, I&#

Re: where to register TeX related software with doc-base?

2008-03-23 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry if this has been answered before, but looking at section 2.3.3 of > the doc-base manual (version 0.8.10) I cannot find a section TeX. If > memory serves me right we used to have a section "tex", at least I > used to regi

where to register TeX related software with doc-base?

2008-03-22 Thread Ralf Treinen
Sorry if this has been answered before, but looking at section 2.3.3 of the doc-base manual (version 0.8.10) I cannot find a section TeX. If memory serves me right we used to have a section "tex", at least I used to register the docs of some my TeX-related packages there :-) Has this se

register

2008-01-13 Thread Giancarlo Niccolai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Register -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHim9Y5nwsoBIDC4YRAgKOAJ0csDSPndMNF2QwgXckfjyelQW7vACfbSiO VPle65WuwWS2XPCiKrHUcvY= =3jJY -END PGP

Re: Bug #193271: galeon: should register in /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser

2003-06-25 Thread Mark Howard
Hi, I've been unable to find documentation about how we're supposed to choose a priority for alternatives. It seems like every web browser maintainer likes their browser the most, so wants it to be the highest. I'm CC'ing debian-devel in the hope that somebody will be able to point me in the dire

Re: Bug#142905: ITP: hotswap -- register/deregister hotswappable IDE hardware

2002-04-19 Thread Martin Waitz
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:16:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > * URL : http://users.ox.ac.uk/~univ377/c600.html leads to an 404: The requested URL /~univ377/c600.html was not found on this server. -- CU, / Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Germany Martin Wait

Bug#142905: ITP: hotswap -- register/deregister hotswappable IDE hardware

2002-04-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-15 Severity: wishlist * Package name: hotswap Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Tim Stadelmann * URL : http://users.ox.ac.uk/~univ377/c600.html * License : HTML Description : register/deregister hotswappable

Bug#95209: ITP: ipcheck - dnydns.org client to register dynamic IP address

2001-04-25 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist URL: http://ipcheck.sourceforge.net License: GPL Description: This package provides an update service for the Free dynamic DNS hosting service at dyndns.org. Ipcheck.py is the only UNIX dyndns.org client rated at Compliant. The Debian ddclien

Subject: http://www.lists and 5000 best domain names free to register

2000-12-22 Thread trademark
and money, register immediately the best names for you, your company and your trademarks. More we pay you 8 $US per domain name definitively registered through your promotion or your affiliates. To take more information and make really money go to: http://members.tripod.de/bestdomain (you