Hmmm, this is what I missed. :-( I guess the only chance is to upload
to t-p-u, right?
Afaict you could do a "source amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel
powerpc ppc64el s390x" upload to unstable so that binaries for all
release architectures were supplied by you rather than by buildds
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 07:17:59AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:24:11PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > So, would this patch to the current r-base package improve things if
> > applied to the version in unstable?
> > [...]
>
> While this would create a
Hi Santiago,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:24:11PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > include /usr/share/R/debian/r-cran.mk
> >
> > which contains:
> >
> > rversion:= $(shell dpkg-query -W -f='$${Version}' r-base-dev)
> > ...
> > ## support ${R:Depends} via debian/${package}.su
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> All R packages are building with
>
> include /usr/share/R/debian/r-cran.mk
>
> which contains:
>
> rversion:= $(shell dpkg-query -W -f='$${Version}' r-base-dev)
> ...
> ## support ${R:Depends} via debian/${package}.substvars
>
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2014-11-11 19:12 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille :
> >> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), r-base-core (>= 3.1.2-2)
> >
> > Hmmm, this is what I missed. :-( I guess the only chance is to upload
> > to t-p-u, right?
>
> That could be an option. You have to coordinate wi
Hi Andreas,
2014-11-11 19:12 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille :
>> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), r-base-core (>= 3.1.2-2)
>
> Hmmm, this is what I missed. :-( I guess the only chance is to upload
> to t-p-u, right?
That could be an option. You have to coordinate with Release Team,
though, as I can't speak fo
Hi Luca,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:04:55PM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> 2014-11-11 16:33 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille :
> > I was close to trap into the pitfall to uploaded an RC bug fix built in
> > an unstable chroot which would not be able to migrate to testing since
> > the R cd
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Simon McVittie writes ("Re: r-base-core upload to unstable does not respect
> freeze policy"):
> > On 11/11/14 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > perhaps we should in general make more use of testing chroots for RC
> > &g
Hi Jonas,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:11:42PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Ian Jackson (2014-11-11 17:19:36)
> >
> > Did you see Andreas's comment about cdbs-generated dependencies ?
> > Is that just a bug in cdbs ?
>
> A bug in some CDBS-compatible snippet, I suspect - not CDBS itself
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:28:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >It's *everything* to do with transitions to testing.
> >
> >r-base 3.1.2-2 does not meet the requirements for a freeze exception
> >and as such will not be in jessie. Due to the way your automatic
> >depenency generation works, any
On Nov 11, 2014 10:34 AM, "Andreas Tille" wrote:
> I was close to trap into the pitfall to uploaded an RC bug fix built in
> an unstable chroot which would not be able to migrate to testing since
> the R cdbs helper injects a
>
> Depends: r-base-core (>= )
This looks like more fallout from #704
Quoting Ian Jackson (2014-11-11 17:19:36)
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Re: r-base-core upload to unstable does not
> respect freeze policy"):
>>
>> There was a bug report requesting builds against tcl/tk 8.5 instead of 8.6.
>> No more, no less -- and I compli
On 2014-11-11 16:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2014-11-11 16:02, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
There was a bug report requesting builds against tcl/tk 8.5 instead of
8.6.
No more, no less -- and I complied.
This nothing to do with wheezy transition issue. I would have thought
you knew better.
It
On 2014-11-11 16:02, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
There was a bug report requesting builds against tcl/tk 8.5 instead of
8.6.
No more, no less -- and I complied.
This nothing to do with wheezy transition issue. I would have thought
you knew better.
It's *everything* to do with transitions to tes
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Re: r-base-core upload to unstable does not respect
freeze policy"):
>
> There was a bug report requesting builds against tcl/tk 8.5 instead of 8.6.
> No more, no less -- and I complied.
>
> This nothing to do with wheezy transition issue. I
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: r-base-core upload to unstable does not respect
freeze policy"):
> On 11/11/14 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > perhaps we should in general make more use of testing chroots for RC
> > bugfixes to testing during the freeze.
>
> For build-
There was a bug report requesting builds against tcl/tk 8.5 instead of 8.6.
No more, no less -- and I complied.
This nothing to do with wheezy transition issue. I would have thought
you knew better.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On 11 November 2014 at 10:02, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| There was a bug report requesting builds against tcl/tk 8.5 instead of 8.6.
Bah. Obviously wrong order: 8.6 instead of 8.5.
D.
| No more, no less -- and I complied.
|
| This nothing to do with wheezy transition issue. I would have
On 11/11/14 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> perhaps we should in general make more use of testing chroots for RC
> bugfixes to testing during the freeze.
For build-time dependencies, I'm not sure that actually helps very much:
the buildds for unstable take build-dependencies from unstable.
If you int
Hi Andreas,
2014-11-11 16:33 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille :
> I was close to trap into the pitfall to uploaded an RC bug fix built in
> an unstable chroot which would not be able to migrate to testing since
> the R cdbs helper injects a
>
> Depends: r-base-core (>= )
>
> So I used a testing chroot
I
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:55:23PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > So I used a testing chroot
>
> perhaps we should in general make more use of testing chroots for RC
> bugfixes to testing during the freeze. This is particularly relevant
> if one is NMUing, and therefore might have less knowledge o
Andreas Tille writes ("r-base-core upload to unstable does not respect freeze
policy"):
> [stuff]
I don't want to take away from what you've said, but:
> So I used a testing chroot
perhaps we should in general make more use of testing chroots for RC
bugfixes to testin
Hi,
Freeze policy[1] says:
Uploads to unstable
===
Since many updates (hopefully, the vast majority) will be via unstable,
changes there can be disruptive if they would be unsuitable for Jessie.
Please be mindful of this, particularly if you maintain a library or key
23 matches
Mail list logo
