Joey Hess writes:
> I've been hearing a bit lately about removing dependencies that are no
> longer needed for stable upgrade paths. The most common reason seems
> that this will make apt need less memory[1].
>
> So then, someone must have measured the memory use. Unless this is a
> kind of prema
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:28:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> So, I've convinced myself this is probably a false optimisation.
And me, too. Thank you for the analysis.
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
I've been hearing a bit lately about removing dependencies that are no
longer needed for stable upgrade paths. The most common reason seems
that this will make apt need less memory[1].
So then, someone must have measured the memory use. Unless this is a
kind of premature optimation. But, I've not
3 matches
Mail list logo
