Scripsit Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> it might be a good idea for make-kpkg to check whether the
>> necessary files are present in the kernel tree (and warn loudly if
>> they are not) when one tries to build modules. On the other hand I
>> have no idea what would be involved in checking thi
#include
* Henning Makholm [Fri, Feb 18 2005, 09:13:26PM]:
> Given the tendency of people like me to just repeat the procedures
> that worked for 2.4, it might be a good idea for make-kpkg to check
> whether the necessary files are present in the kernel tree (and warn
> loudly if they are not) wh
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 20:35 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem
> sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either).
>
> This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just
> use the standard kerne
Scripsit Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, basically, your saying that the right way to do this kind of
> things is to use the corresponding kernel-headers package, and apt-get
> tells me that I need as well kernel-kbuild to build "out-of-tree
> kernel modules" which seems to be exactly what
Hi,
(I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem
sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either).
This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just
use the standard kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7 package) but used
kernel-source-2.6.10 with the .
Scripsit sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
>> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
> i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.
IME, this message is typically seen when one complies a modu
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.
i don't get this message if i use "m-a build pwc-source" or the
appropriate --append-to-version flags with m
Hi,
I confirm that the pwc driver works well.
Only at boot time, I have the following messages:
usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
Linux video capture interface: v1.00
pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
pwc: Unknown symbol video_devdata
pwc: Unkn
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:53:01PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> i've been using this new pwc driver for a while now and have not had
> any problems with it, tested on i386 and amd64 boxen.
The compiled source from saillard.org works fine here for my PowerPC system
as well... (tested with 2.6.8 t
i've been using this new pwc driver for a while now and have not had
any problems with it, tested on i386 and amd64 boxen.
so, after looking over the latest version, assuming there are no
new issues i'll plan on uploading the pwc-source package to unstable.
i don't think this really warrants a
10 matches
Mail list logo
