Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> But current apt-cacher still miss some nice features of apt-proxy like
>>> the possibility to enforce a server to be use for Debian or anything
>>> else.
>>
>> Parse error. What do you want to enforce? You
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But current apt-cacher still miss some nice features of apt-proxy like
>> the possibility to enforce a server to be use for Debian or anything
>> else.
>
> Parse error. What do you want to enforce? You can setup path mapping
> (from /debian to a list of
#include
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, Jun 20 2006, 09:45:24AM]:
> Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your
> >> skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in wha
#include
* Chris Halls [Tue, Jun 20 2006, 01:04:04PM]:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your
> > skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in what they do if not
> > how they do it.
>
> Well, when
* Hamish Moffatt [Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:33:21 +1000]:
> Actually it seems closer to approx than to apt-cacher. I switched over
> as apt-proxy became unusable and have few complaints. Like apt-proxy,
> the sources are set on the server rather than specified by the clients,
> and it has its own web se
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:38:13PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Monday 19 June 2006 01:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
> >>
> >> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
> >
> >
Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your
>> skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in what they do if not
>> how they do it.
>
> Well, when apt-cacher started
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your
> skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in what they do if not
> how they do it.
Well, when apt-cacher started out, it needed an apache installation to work
an
Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 19 June 2006 01:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>>
>> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
>
> Otavio has asked me to maintain apt-proxy again and I am in the process of
> preparin
On Monday 19 June 2006 01:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>
> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
Otavio has asked me to maintain apt-proxy again and I am in the process of
preparing an upload.
> I have not noticed many updates to
"Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ otavio CCed ]
>
> On 06/18/2006 09:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>>
>> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
Sorry by not reply. I must had lost your mail.
Wel
PING missing_maintainers (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.136 ms64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.116 ms64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=3 ttl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ otavio CCed ]
On 06/18/2006 09:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>
> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
> Peter Veenstra (dosbox)
>
> I have not noticed many updates to these progr
Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
Peter Veenstra (dosbox)
I have not noticed many updates to these programs recently, and both seem to
have some ignored bugs in the bts such as
#336433
#312969
#301925
#362928
I have sent both m
14 matches
Mail list logo
