Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:30:41 +0200
> Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> - I will prominently mark the package as deprecated and discourage
>> new packages from using it. As part of this I will move the package
>> to main/oldlibs.
>
> A note in the description is one way but are there
Le mardi 30 juin 2009 à 19:44 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> The main point is that using gtk+extra2 in an application makes it very
> difficult to migrate that package to GTK+3.0 so I really don't want new
> applications to use gtk+extra2.
They should be migrated to use the widgets that already
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:30:41 +0200
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> > Yes, but that will also mean package using gtk-extra2 will not be
> > able to link to gtk3, which is what Neil was saying IIUC.
>
> OK, not a big deal for as long as GTK+2 remains in Debian.
The main point is that using gtk+extra2 in
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> OK, I think that explains it. Here is what I propose:
>
> - I will adopt the package gtk+extra and maintain it in Debian for as long as
> GTK+2 is in Debian and libgtkada2 needs it.
> - I will not update the package to use GTK+3.
> - I will prominently mark the package as
Selon Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> So, my understanting was correct then: gtk-extra2 will FTBFS only when
>> you remove GTK+2 from Debian, not when you introduce GTK+3.
>
> Yes, but that will also mean package using gtk-extra2 will not be able to
> link to gtk3, which is wha
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> So, my understanting was correct then: gtk-extra2 will FTBFS only when you
> remove GTK+2 from Debian, not when you introduce GTK+3.
Yes, but that will also mean package using gtk-extra2 will not be able to link
to gtk3, which is what Neil was saying IIUC.
> Joss, can you
Selon Josselin Mouette :
> Le lundi 29 juin 2009 à 23:30 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:19:45 +0100
> > Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > > gtk+extra2 will FTBFS as soon as the functions that will be removed in
> > > GTK+3.0 become deprecated in GTK+2.0. GTK+2.0 doesn't have
Le lundi 29 juin 2009 à 23:30 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:19:45 +0100
> Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > gtk+extra2 will FTBFS as soon as the functions that will be removed in
> > GTK+3.0 become deprecated in GTK+2.0. GTK+2.0 doesn't have to be
> > removed from Debian for gt
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:19:45 +0100
Neil Williams wrote:
> gtk+extra2 will FTBFS as soon as the functions that will be removed in
> GTK+3.0 become deprecated in GTK+2.0. GTK+2.0 doesn't have to be
> removed from Debian for gtk+extra2 to break. Yes, that isn't how
> things *should* work and it isn'
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This is easy to do by advance. If your library builds with
> -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
> -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED, it will only require minor changes to work
> with GTK+ 3.
Plus -DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
Cheers,
Emilio
signature.asc
Descrip
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:56:30 +0200
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Neil Williams writes:
> > OK, there is a bug report already asking for libgtkada to not
> > build-depend on gtk+extra2 (#534872) but I don't see how using an
> > embedded copy is going to solve the problem.
> >
> > The embedded copy is j
Le lundi 29 juin 2009 à 22:56 +0200, Ludovic Brenta a écrit :
> Right; I realized that while thinking a bit about the issue earlier
> today. Then I went to gtk.org and it seems that GTK+3 is still many
> months away from release.
>
> Is there a published roadmap for when GTK+2 is removed from Deb
Neil Williams writes:
> OK, there is a bug report already asking for libgtkada to not
> build-depend on gtk+extra2 (#534872) but I don't see how using an
> embedded copy is going to solve the problem.
>
> The embedded copy is just going to break in precisely the same way as
> the copy packaged as
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:31:17 +0200
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Neil Williams writes:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/05/msg00627.html
> >
> > One month on and I've heard nothing from the other maintainers with
> > packages that depend on gtk+extra2 or from anyone else interested in
> >
Neil Williams writes:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/05/msg00627.html
>
> One month on and I've heard nothing from the other maintainers with
> packages that depend on gtk+extra2 or from anyone else interested in
> porting gtk+extra2 (or even just GtkSheet) to Gtk3.0.
>
> I therefore
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/05/msg00627.html
One month on and I've heard nothing from the other maintainers with
packages that depend on gtk+extra2 or from anyone else interested in
porting gtk+extra2 (or even just GtkSheet) to Gtk3.0.
I therefore propose to seek pre-emptive removal
16 matches
Mail list logo
