Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates

2016-05-30 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 30-05-16 09:42, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:40:32PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch > (or upgrade to a snapshot) on

Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable)

2016-05-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:40:32PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a > > > > patch > > > > (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDMM-1 or wh

Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable)

2016-05-29 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch > > > (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDMM-1 or whatever > > > format > > > you choose. Not 1.0-15 or so. > > Here the question is "

Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable)

2016-05-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:37:00AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:44:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch > > (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDMM-1 or whatever > > forma

Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable)

2016-05-28 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:44:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch > (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDMM-1 or whatever format > you choose. Not 1.0-15 or so. Here the question is "if you package unreleas

package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable)

2016-05-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, I have seen various packages (mostly from the same maintainer, though) which do branch updates in a imho wrong way. Updates to a stable branch fixes or backporting fixes is OK. I don't deny that or so. But the package IMHO should have a correct version then. e.g. if you have a package 1.0 an