Re: non package names in by_inst file of popcon

2016-09-04 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > >> where the second field is not a valid package name. Can someone please >> tell me if this is expected or if I should inform someone of the >> problem? > > Bug #833695 was already fi

Re: non package names in by_inst file of popcon

2016-09-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > where the second field is not a valid package name. Can someone please > tell me if this is expected or if I should inform someone of the > problem? Bug #833695 was already filed about this issue. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.o

non package names in by_inst file of popcon

2016-09-03 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
In http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst , I see some lines where the package names do not make any sense. For example, in the latest file, I see 105799 /gnomi®aD>p00rerD.hare/5pataE>/bbsd 1 0 0 0 1 (Not in sid) where the second field is not a valid package name. Can someone please tel