On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:42:54AM -0500, Daniel Martin wrote:
>Speaking of which, where did netdate go? I've been wondering for a
>while what happened to it.
rdate may do what you are after.
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limi
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:42:54AM -0500, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Speaking of which, where did netdate go? I've been wondering for a
> while what happened to it.
It didn't actually have a license.
License problems: namely, there isn't one, and it's not clearly public
domain, and nobody knows who the author is.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> >
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
> netstd only suggests it. And the parameters to tftpd have changed
> and the new package does not up
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:13:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:09:26AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> > When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
> > netstd only sug
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:09:26AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
> netstd only suggests it. And the parameters to tftpd have changed
> and the new packa
Hi,
Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
netstd only suggests it. And the parameters to tftpd have changed
and the new package does not update the inetd entry.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB.
7 matches
Mail list logo