Re: mozilla.d.n (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:18:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 13:28]: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]: > > > > That being said, it would be really helpful to be abl

Re: mozilla.d.n (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)

* Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 13:28]: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]: > > > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds > > > to build the mozilla.d.n packages... > > > > Wo

Re: mozilla.d.n (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]: > > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds > > to build the mozilla.d.n packages... > > Would it work to build the packages in unstable? If so, why not

mozilla.d.n (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)

* Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]: > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds > to build the mozilla.d.n packages... Would it work to build the packages in unstable? If so, why not uploading them to experimental and re-branding them in mozilla.d.n? And