Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:58:52PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > I will file bugs soon (hopefully before leaving on [VAC] on 18/4). One > interesting question is: against which of the conflicting packages > should the bug be filed? The less popular one according to popcon? The > more recent one in t

Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:20:21PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:44 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > > I'd be interested in seeing how there can be 75 package pairs with shared > > file > > names which coinstall successfully. In the case of a Replaces making that > >

Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:44 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote: > I'd be interested in seeing how there can be 75 package pairs with shared > file > names which coinstall successfully. In the case of a Replaces making that > possible, I'd say that the package with files being replaced should usually

Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:58:52 pm Ralf Treinen wrote: > Hi, > > The following list contains packages that fail to install at the same time > since one package tries to overwrite a file owned by the other package: > > http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/ > > In these package pairs, (at lea

missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hi, The following list contains packages that fail to install at the same time since one package tries to overwrite a file owned by the other package: http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/ In these package pairs, (at least) one of the two packages must declare a conflict with the other pack