On Sun, Dec 17, 2006, David Weinehall wrote:
> Some entries seem to list newer Debian-versions than upstream
> versions... Some watch-files out of sync?
The list of GNOME versions is built from the 2.16 tarball repository,
but Debian might have cherry-picked some newer upstream releases, such
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 04:52:04PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyon
Luk Claes wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> > why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
>
> The update
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
The updates have not been reactivated since the move of f
I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
Thanks!
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It sounds like all you need is for dpkg-scanpackages or apt-ftparchive to
> optionally accept a list of filenames, instead of a list of directories.
> I think this would be a useful enhancement.
apt-ftparchive already does.
--
James
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 01:19:36PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > There's no need for a database unless you want to maintain multiple
> > distributions out of cross-sections of the pool, as Debian does.
>
> > Or is there a dif
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 01:19:36PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:15:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > madison requires connectivity to a Debian database which is not publ
nerated; thus
> > people who want to partially mirror or create their own Debian-flavour
> > should
> > create their own Debian database from information gathered from packagelists
> > which are downloaded by apt.
>
> Those people are going to want all of dak (ka
Previously Andrew Suffield wrote:
> However, the value of a package that would be used by about half a
> dozen people in total is probably not all that high.
We have packages that nobody uses. I wouldn't mind seeing the whole
archive management suite being packaged properly, and I think it
would
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:15:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > madison requires connectivity to a Debian database which is not publicly
> > accessible, so it is only useful on a couple of internal Debian
>
e their own Debian database from information gathered from packagelists
> which are downloaded by apt.
Those people are going to want all of dak (katie) anyway, which
contains madison. It's not packaged either, but is available from
anonymous cvs at cvs.debian.org.
However, the value of a package
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:15:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
>
> > madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> > search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to package
> it?
madison requires connectivity to a Debian database which is not
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
> search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to
> package it?
>
madison has to be run on ftp-master, thats why it is not pack
madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to
package it?
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL
16 matches
Mail list logo
