Re: libre version of iceweasel

2015-06-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:40:45AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Jun 09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > > > open question: is there a perceived need to dig into the source code > > > of firefox and, just as was done

Re: libre version of iceweasel

2015-06-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:40:45AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jun 09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > open question: is there a perceived need to dig into the source code > > of firefox and, just as was done with google-chrome to create > > chromium-browser, permanently patch out c

Re: libre version of iceweasel

2015-06-09 Thread Jack Hill
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: open question: is there a perceived need to dig into the source code of firefox and, just as was done with google-chrome to create chromium-browser, permanently patch out certain "features"? There is GNU IceCat

Re: libre version of iceweasel

2015-06-09 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jun 09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > open question: is there a perceived need to dig into the source code > of firefox and, just as was done with google-chrome to create > chromium-browser, permanently patch out certain "features"? No: I am a grown up and I can choose by myself which

libre version of iceweasel

2015-06-09 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/06/09/1722236/mozilla-responds-to-firefox-user-backlash-over-pocket-integration after seeing this, i'm becoming increasingly alarmed at where firefox is going [the first signs were the way in which the announcement was made to focus on "speed improvements" when ch