Re: libpopt

2011-11-05 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Paul Wise [05 19:00 +0800]: [...] > For Debian there are only disadvantages to inlined popt in most cases. Thanks for all your advises. I'll take care of them by packaging a new version of moc build against libpopt-dev. Elimar -- Alles was viel bedacht wird ist be

Re: libpopt

2011-11-05 Thread sean finney
Hiya, On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 07:00:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > we have many packages which are build against popt. Some of them > > have included a bundled (inlined) verion of popt. But they are using > > Debian's libopt-dev like

Re: libpopt

2011-11-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Thanks for any suggestions I forgot to say: if you are contacting upstreams, please include this URL: http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ.

Re: libpopt

2011-11-05 Thread Paul Wise
7;t know or don't care about the disadvantages. > Are there any advantages to use inlined popt over libpopt-dev? For Debian there are only disadvantages to inlined popt in most cases. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list

libpopt

2011-11-05 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
escribes how to handle inlined libs, which exist as a sepearte package as well. Does one know why some upstream developers are packaging popt inside? Are there any advantages to use inlined popt over libpopt-dev? Thanks for any suggestions Elimar -- Experience is something you don't ge