db.debian.org (was: libgd1 vs. libgd1g)

2000-09-05 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > Nondevelopers do not have access to the away information in db.d.o. Ugh. They _are_ presented with a form where the "on vacation" box can be checked, and the subsequent search simply returns "0", no errors explaining that this info can't be retr

Re: libgd1 vs. libgd1g

2000-09-04 Thread David Starner
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:44:44PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote: > There are already loads of bugreports like that filed against > webalizer, because people don't seem to bother checking the existing > bugreports before fileing yet another one, and, worse, people are > getting angry when you don

Re: libgd1 vs. libgd1g

2000-09-04 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 2904T14+0200, Remco van de Meent wrote: > getting angry when you don't reply to their requests within one hour, > even if you are 'on leave' as stated on db.debian.org. Nondevelopers do not have access to the away information in db.d.o. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: libgd1 vs. libgd1g

2000-09-04 Thread Remco van de Meent
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > The libgd maintainer decided to drop support for a libc5-based > > libgd and renamed the libgd1g package to libgd1 (I personally don't > > think that this was a good idea as it might cause problems during > > upgrades). > > Do I interpret this right that I should file a

Re: libgd1 vs. libgd1g

2000-09-04 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Please refrain from Cc:ing me - I _do_ read the lists I'm posting to *sigh* It seems that that can't be said often enough. On 04 Sep 2000, Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The libgd maintainer decided to drop support for a libc5-based libgd and > renamed the libgd1g package to libgd1 (I

Re: libgd1 vs. libgd1g

2000-09-04 Thread Stefan Gybas
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > webalizer and linuxconf now depends on libgd1g, which currently isn't > anymore available from our ftp-servers. Not any longer. The newest linuxconf package in woody depends on the new libgd1: Package: linuxconf [...] Version: 1.20r2-1 Depends: netbase (>= 3.16-1), logrot

libgd1 vs. libgd1g

2000-09-04 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! I've noticed a serious problem with libgd1 (or, libgd1g) during the last month. And I don't really know what to do about. webalizer and linuxconf now depends on libgd1g, which currently isn't anymore available from our ftp-servers. And on the other hand libgd-perl depends on libgd1