Hello!
darkestkhan has written on Monday, 3 September, at 19:15:
>I'm long time user of pcmanfm (though I'm using it under fluxbox) and
>I didn't have any REAL problems with it since...
>10 months or so? While there are some bugs here and there (like not
>being able to run 2 instances of it,
I'm long time user of pcmanfm (though I'm using it under fluxbox) and
I didn't have any REAL problems with it since...
10 months or so? While there are some bugs here and there (like not
being able to run 2 instances of it, even under different users
(sometimes I like to run it as a root in order t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-09-03 00:10, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Ansgar Burchardt has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 22:04:
>> "Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
>>> Tell me, please, how I can achieve the inclusion of stable
>>> version of libfm/pcmanf
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 00:42:27 +0300
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
> Thank you very much for that detailed explanation. So you think if
> debian user reports the bug in upstream tracker I should send him back
> into debian BTS so debian will know that the bug really exists and
> bothers debian us
Hello!
Ansgar Burchardt has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 22:04:
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
>> Tell me, please, how I can achieve the inclusion of stable version of
>> libfm/pcmanfm into next debian release? BTW, next release of Ubuntu will
>> have 1.0 (or even 1.0.1) versions i
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 21:51:
>On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 22:33:14 +0300
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
>> You may hate me saying this but that's sad fact. If you think it's normal
>> then I'll shut up and let users ask you why their bugreports are never
>> fixed
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 22:33:14 +0300
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
> >>The version libfm 0.1.17
> >> and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
>
> >None of which appear to have been filed against the Debian packages. It
> >could be that no-one else has experienced such pro
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
> Tell me, please, how I can achieve the inclusion of stable version of
> libfm/pcmanfm into next debian release? BTW, next release of Ubuntu will
> have 1.0 (or even 1.0.1) versions included. Why debian should not?
There were a few mails about libfm 1.0 on lxde-
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 19:17:
>On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:30:31 +0300
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
>>The version libfm 0.1.17
>> and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
>None of which appear to have been filed against the Debian
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:30:31 +0300
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
>The version libfm 0.1.17
> and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
None of which appear to have been filed against the Debian packages. It
could be that no-one else has experienced such problems or the
p
Hello!
There is a problem with libfm and pcmanfm that are coming into next
stable debian release. Those are much outdated. The version libfm 0.1.17
and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
- lock up of X server on drag & drop operation;
- frequent random crash
11 matches
Mail list logo
