Re: kydpdict relationships

2007-07-25 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:55:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:37 +0200, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On 11090 March 1977, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > >> Now I need to decide what the relationship between these two should > >> be. > > > Depends. > >

Re: kydpdict relationships

2007-07-25 Thread Marvin Renich
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070724 21:05]: > If we are going to transition to installing Recommends by > default in lenny, I would say go with the Recommends, since it caters > to more users. > > Or else, use Depends, but that makes the system less efficient > for th

Re: Installing Recommends by default (was: kydpdict relationships)

2007-07-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:26:14AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I currently can't ues Recommends by default because of lsb-release, so I > > have a bit of a vested interest in solutions that don't require that.) > What's the problem with lsb-release?

Installing Recommends by default (was: kydpdict relationships)

2007-07-24 Thread Frank Küster
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (I currently can't ues Recommends by default because of lsb-release, so I > have a bit of a vested interest in solutions that don't require that.) What's the problem with lsb-release? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein

Re: kydpdict relationships

2007-07-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm. Let us examine the two common cases: > a) User has not bought proprietary dictionaries. > i) With recommends installed by default; they can have a working >package. Without that, the binary package is useless. >ii) With

Re: kydpdict relationships

2007-07-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:37 +0200, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On 11090 March 1977, Marcin Owsiany wrote: >> Now I need to decide what the relationship between these two should >> be. > Depends. Hmm. Let us examine the two common cases: a) User has not bought proprietar

Re: kydpdict relationships

2007-07-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11090 March 1977, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > Now I need to decide what the relationship between these two should be. Depends. > If you're lucky to have at least one of the proprietary dictionaries, then you > probably wouldn't want to install the free one, since any of the pay-for ones > are def

kydpdict relationships

2007-07-24 Thread Marcin Owsiany
Hi, [ retrying on this list as suggested by Sean ] I'm packaging kydpdict (#433847) which contains a Qt-based front-end for several dictionary formats. Most of them are proprietary English-Polish dictionaries that you need to pay for. However the upstream package contains free dictionary files ta