Hi
On 05-04-2025 14:06, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 5/4/25 a las 8:44, Paul Gevers escribió:
Remember, if you really think a bug shouldn't be RC (particularly if
you are the maintainer),
downgrade it with an explanation.
Does this include the case where a Release Manager previously raised the
s
El 5/4/25 a las 8:44, Paul Gevers escribió:
Remember, if you really think a bug shouldn't be RC (particularly if you are
the maintainer),
downgrade it with an explanation.
Does this include the case where a Release Manager previously raised the
severity from important to serious?
Thanks.
* Paul Gevers , 2025-04-05 08:44:
#1071316 infinipath-psm
FTBFS: ips_proto_dump.c:142:15: error: static declaration of
‘strlcat’ follows non-static declaration
https://bugs.debian.org/1069553
Wrong URL, should be: https://bugs.debian.org/1071316
--
Jakub Wilk
Dear all,
During the preparation phase of bookworm, I was running an awareness
campagne on RC bugs [1] in package in the key package set [2]. As those
packages are exempted from being auto-removed, their RC bugs are
ironically less exposed. Ideally we should get the number of RC bugs in
trixi
4 matches
Mail list logo
