On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:47:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> /usr/sbin/update-inetd is moved from netbase to update-inetd.
> Daemons can continue depending on netbase or switch to depend on
> inet-superserver,
[...]
> etch
> netbase
> Depends: inet-superserver, lots of other st
This is my revised plan, where update-inetd will be moved to its own
package to be depended on by the inetds which want it (the others will
need to provide their own version of the command).
Please comment now, because I want to upload the package ASAP.
sarge
netbase
Depends: op
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 14:22:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 30, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that duplicating update-inetd in most of the
> > inetd providing packages is a good idea, even if this would allow
> > xinetd to be able to replace a normal inetd easily. I'd prefer tha
On Aug 30, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that duplicating update-inetd in most of the
> inetd providing packages is a good idea, even if this would allow
> xinetd to be able to replace a normal inetd easily. I'd prefer that the
> odd cases override update-inetd, via
ble transition to that new update-inetd
> > (if it happens to exist some day), aj was fine with that.
> OK, but then let's do it right.
> The idea is to move update-inetd from netbase to each one of the inetd
> packages (openbsd-inetd, inetutils-inetd, rlinetd, xinetd), whi
pens to exist some day), aj was fine with that.
OK, but then let's do it right.
The idea is to move update-inetd from netbase to each one of the inetd
packages (openbsd-inetd, inetutils-inetd, rlinetd, xinetd), which will
provide the inet-superserver virtual package and depend on a version of
netb
6 matches
Mail list logo
