Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread Craig Brozefsky
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote: > > > Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is, > > why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer > > closing them. > > OK, done. I just don't want to st

Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread Will Newton
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote: > Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is, > why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer > closing them. OK, done. I just don't want to step on anyone's toes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread David Starner
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 03:04:43PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can > > tag them "fixed", by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > OK, if Craig hasn't

Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread Will Newton
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote: > Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can > tag them "fixed", by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, if Craig hasn't done it by the end of today I will do that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:34:13PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > Read up on the BTS docs, but the common ways are: > > Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "close 140049" No! Don't fucking do that! Geez, how many times does one have to repeat that. -- 2. That which causes joy or

Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct > procedure for getting these bugs closed? Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can tag them "fixed", by sending 'tag fixe

Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote: > > I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct > procedure for getting these bugs closed? > > The changelog looks like this: > > ilisp (5.11.1-7) uns

Re: ilisp debian package

2002-04-07 Thread Will Newton
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote: I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct procedure for getting these bugs closed? The changelog looks like this: ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable; urgency=low * well 125744 was fixed, but I put the files in the old

ilisp debian package

2002-04-06 Thread Will Newton
(I have CCd to debian-devel in case you are on holiday or otherwise indisposed to close these) ilisp is being removed from woody because of a bug that is fixed but not closed. According to your changelog the following bugs are fixed, but are not closed: 125744 140049 138669 137011 98132 12885