On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 08:46:04PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 22:07 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [...]
> > Ubuntu no longer uses isc-dhcp by default, because it no longer uses
> > ifupdown; NetworkManager and networkd both have their own implementations of
> > dhcp client
On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 22:07 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
> Ubuntu no longer uses isc-dhcp by default, because it no longer uses
> ifupdown; NetworkManager and networkd both have their own implementations of
> dhcp clients which are used by preference. *However*, isc-dhcp is still
> installed
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 21:34:39 CEST Michael Tokarev wrote:
> What's up with ISC dhclient?
"ISC DHCP Client and Relay End of Maintenance" @
https://www.isc.org/blogs/dhcp-client-relay-eom/
Couple of quotes:
"ISC plans to end maintenance of the ISC DHCP client and relay by the end of
Q1, 2022."
On 2022-05-08 2:07 p.m., Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are for d
On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 08:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete
> fail]
>
> > I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> > alternatives are
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
> I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
> and
08.05.2022 18:24, Michael Stone wrote:
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are for
On 2022-05-08 21:15:07 +0200 (+0200), Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> OpenBSD maintains its own fork of dhclient, just to list another
> alternative.
[...]
Though OpenBSD added dhcpleased[*] last year, so I expect dhclient's
days there are numbered too.
[*] http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;s
El 08/05/22 a las 11:24, Michael Stone escribió:
> [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
>
> I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
> and what the imp
Hi Michael,
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> So what's the path forward, maintaining compatibility and not breaking
> systems upgrading from current stable? Do we come up with a dhcpcd5 variant
> that *only* touches interfaces it is directed to touch via
> /etc/netw
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client
(that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality
of ifupdown and what the implications are for debian upgrades
generally.
isc-dhcp
11 matches
Mail list logo