Re: huge wnpp bug report page

2006-08-04 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Hi, Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:39 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror > > nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system. > > Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32). Really. Firefox gets very slow, ko

Re: huge wnpp bug report page

2006-08-04 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:49 schrieb Ben Armstrong: > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages > > more usable. > > Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here? > > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Indeed, did

Re: huge wnpp bug report page

2006-08-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, > I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror > nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system. Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32). > 3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a single web page is a bit much, isn't it? Possibly. It's also 2

Re: huge wnpp bug report page

2006-08-04 Thread Ben Armstrong
Hendrik Sattler wrote: > I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages more > usable. > Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here? http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

huge wnpp bug report page

2006-08-04 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Hi, I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system. 3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a single web page is a bit much, isn't it? So I was just wondering if it is really necessary to show 3500 resolved issues by default? They c