On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:52:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther:
> > > Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for
> > > the current setup, unless we throw
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:52:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther:
> > Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for
> > the current setup, unless we throw out the current mini-freeze, and
> > restart everything.
>
> As said,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:52:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther:
> > Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for
> > the current setup, unless we throw out the current mini-freeze, and
> > restart everything.
>
> As said,
Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther:
> Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for
> the current setup, unless we throw out the current mini-freeze, and
> restart everything.
As said, I'll monitor the ocaml packages so that your current
mini-freeze will work.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:18:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > These all boil down to the same problem: ocaml was upgraded to
> > > ocaml-3.07, while the packages that were
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:26:26AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Yes. Adding explicit (>> version) build dependency to the libraries will
> > help there. I will add this to the debian/ocaml policy.
>
> If you'll do that, there will not be need for m68k maintainers to be
> notified about this..
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > These all boil down to the same problem: ocaml was upgraded to
> > ocaml-3.07, while the packages that were available at the time depended
> > on ocaml-3.06-1. Since that doesn't exist an
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:57:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Ideally, it could be automated, by delaying the build
> > of these packages by one day, and it would be fine.
>
> That's an option, although imperfect since it assumes that all
> architectures will always build all packages withi
Op ma 20-10-2003, om 11:13 schreef Sven Luther:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:57:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Ideally, it could be automated, by delaying the build
> > > of these packages by one day, and it would be fine.
> >
> > That's an option, although imperfect since it assumes tha
Op ma 20-10-2003, om 09:07 schreef Sven Luther:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > These all boil down to the same problem: ocaml was upgraded to
> > ocaml-3.07, while the packages that were available at the time depended
> > on ocaml-3.06-1. Since that doesn't e
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op zo 19-10-2003, om 20:04 schreef Sven Luther:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > > > I've never understood which is the right/polit
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You should first check what the status of your package is, by going to
> http://buildd.debian.org/stats/ . I wrote some documentation on what the
> different states actually mean; you can find it at
> http://people.debian.org/~woute
Op zo 19-10-2003, om 20:04 schreef Sven Luther:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > > I've never understood which is the right/polity way of requests for
> > > triggering a new rebuild of packages. Should
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > So all seems well, and to be in the hand of the autobuilders. The
> >
> > Actually the situation is still
Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > So all seems well, and to be in the hand of the autobuilders. The
>
> Actually the situation is still the same, so I think that we should do
> something.
>
> I've never unders
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> So all seems well, and to be in the hand of the autobuilders. The
Actually the situation is still the same, so I think that we should do
something.
I've never understood which is the right/polity way of requests for
triggering a new r
16 matches
Mail list logo