On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Why not simply rotate based on log file size by default?
This sounds like a good idea. The version of logrotate in Lenny even has
a "size" option in it's config file format to support this.
A default of 100M sounds reasonable.
It's a pity that logr
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <200901271009.35031.russ...@coker.com.au> you wrote:
> > Would it hurt to have a duplicate start entry in a wtmp file? If not
> > then is there any reason not to duplicate the entries from sessions in
> > progress from the wtmp.1 file to th
In article <200901271009.35031.russ...@coker.com.au> you wrote:
> Would it hurt to have a duplicate start entry in a wtmp file? If not then is
> there any reason not to duplicate the entries from sessions in progress from
> the wtmp.1 file to the wtmp file so that "last" will display all session
Currently if a user is logged in while logrotate renames the /var/log/wtmp
file then the command "last -i -f /var/log/wtmp.1" will give a result such as
the following:
root pts/010.0.0.1 Fri Jan 16 13:17 gone - no logout
Also the command "last -i&qu
4 matches
Mail list logo
