Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-09-18 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Steve Langasek wrote: > Hmm, I've looked over the packages mentioned above, and none of the others > seem to be removable. I think someone's been sneaking new GNOME1 packages > into the archive when I wasn't looking. :) > > libcapplet is closest, only python-gnome-1.2 as a reverse-dep after the

Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-09-12 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 385417 ftp.debian.org retitle 385417 RM: gwrapguile -- RoQA; orphaned, obsolete library thanks On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-27 15:39]: > > > I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:

Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-09-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-27 15:39]: > > I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages: > > bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib > > libcapplet libglade oaf > gwrapguile and gtkhtml have no reverse-dependencies in Debian except for >

Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-05-28 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, May 27, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: >>python-gnome has a build-dependency on libgtkhtml-dev which >> should be trivially removable since none of its binary packages use it. > > python-gnome is also deprecated and should go away when po

Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-05-28 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, May 27, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: >python-gnome has a build-dependency on libgtkhtml-dev which > should be trivially removable since none of its binary packages use it. python-gnome is also deprecated and should go away when possible, I've filed bugs on the rdeps already.

Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-05-27 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Sat, 27 May 2006 15:49:41 -0700]: Hi Thomas, > (indeed, whenever I use rdepends I get a lot of > spurious entries, and I don't know why, and it requires gobs of manual > work to figure out which ones are real). One scenario in which it does not work: http://chistera.yi.

Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-05-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 12:00:43PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages: > >> bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib >> libcapplet libglade oaf > > gwrapguile an

Re: gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-05-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 12:00:43PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages: > bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib > libcapplet libglade oaf gwrapguile and gtkhtml have no reverse-dependencies in Debian excep

gnome 1 packages up for adoption

2006-05-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages: bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib libcapplet libglade oaf I have been doing so because gnucash (which I maintain) was the last major gnome-1 package, and the gnome maintainers (quite reasonably) did n