>> "MS" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I and Marcus have trouble with cvs-buildpackage. Better
Martin> wait/contact Manoj before you get into the strange problems
Martin> we have.
I seems that a conf_prefix='debian' is needed in /etc/cvsdeb.conf.
With this line, everythi
On Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 06:56:59PM -0400, Justin Maurer wrote:
>
> (for the purposes of this email, consider my sig my resume).
> i am an admin at a local high school. our shell server is a p233
> with 128m ram and 12gb disk. it will soon be upgraded to 256mb, and sooner
> or lat
Hi,
>>"Martin" == Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "JM" == Justin Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> i have never used cvs-buildpackage, but would be willing to
JM> generate nightly .debs. what do people think of this?
Martin> I and Marcus have trouble with cvs-buildpacka
>> "JM" == Justin Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> i have never used cvs-buildpackage, but would be willing to
JM> generate nightly .debs. what do people think of this?
I and Marcus have trouble with cvs-buildpackage. Better wait/contact
Manoj before you get into the strange problems we ha
(for the purposes of this email, consider my sig my resume).
i am an admin at a local high school. our shell server is a p233
with 128m ram and 12gb disk. it will soon be upgraded to 256mb, and sooner
or later, a second processor. it sits on a t1, with incoming ftp supposed
I would recommend installing them all over. Numerous little things
changed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18 Jun 1998, Jim Pick wrote:
> Anybody that installed the unofficial pre-release .debs I put out last
> week will probably need to install these .debs by hand (instead of
> relying on dselect) - because I didn't increment the version number.
hi,
which ones have changed? Should we install _all
Hi,
I've uploaded the Gnome 0.20 Debian packages to incoming on
master.debian.org (also available at http://www.jimpick.com/ )
I had some problems with the gnome-admin package, so I didn't finish
it. I will be travelling for 4 days, and I will figure it out when I
am back. I also did not packag
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaleh) writes:
> Only if we are wrong. We should endeavor to do what the upstream
> maintainer does unless it is flat wrong. We are not RH, maybe they
> should make their sonames match ours. No, we should both do what is
> right.
And,
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Only if we are wrong. We should endeavor to do what the upstream
> maintainer does unless it is flat wrong. We are not RH, maybe they
> should make their sonames match ours. No, we should both do what is
> right.
I definitely advocate following the upstream
Only if we are wrong. We should endeavor to do what the upstream
maintainer does unless it is flat wrong. We are not RH, maybe they
should make their sonames match ours. No, we should both do what is
right.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Steve Dunham wrote:
>
> The soname issues are with libjpeg, libgdbm, libncurses.
>
> DebianRedhat
> ==
> libjpeg.so.6a libjpeg.so.6
> libgdbm.so.1 libgdbm.so.2
> libncurses.so.3.4 libncurses.so.3.0
>
> For now, most of these i
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
> > libjpeg have different sonames.)
> How did this happen? Shouldn't we try to rectify this ASAP so that there is
> binary compatibility?
O
At 22:29 +1000 1998-04-23, Herbert Xu wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
>> libjpeg have different sonames.)
>
>How did this happen?
2 is the upstream soname for libpng 1.0, so we are doing the right thing there
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
> libjpeg have different sonames.)
How did this happen? Shouldn't we try to rectify this ASAP so that there is
binary compatibility?
--
Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is out! ( http://www.debia
David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
> > rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
> > weeks and I think you will see more.
I've got most of the packaging for gnome 0.13 done. Unfortunately,
the gd
David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 03:13:24PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
> > rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
> > weeks and I think you will see more.
> The
On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 03:13:24PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
> rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
> weeks and I think you will see more.
The thing I was wondering about is getting support in t
GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very rapidly. Jim
Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more weeks and I think you
will see more.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know what the status of debian+gnome is? Is anyone
working on this? If they haven't already spent the money we donated
to them, could we ask that a small piece of it go towards having
someone spend the time to make it so that deb's are generated
automatically as well as rpm's? I woul
20 matches
Mail list logo
